MythologyMythologyDocumentariesFestivalspersonswarsBeutiful HellasArtFun

28.2.17

Vix, France

ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ (σύντομα)
Hill dominating the village of Vix and the Seine. Mont-Lassois, also called Mont-Saint-Marcel and Mont-Roussillon, consists of two plateaus. The higher of the two, at a height of 100 m above the valley, has remains of prehistoric occupations.

On the lower plateau a necropolis of the 7th c. A.D. is the only archaeological vestige. The importance of the site was revealed in 1929 by excavations which, after being interrupted in 1939, were resumed in 1947, and continue today. Mont-Lassois was inhabited from Neolithic to Merovingian times, but it was the site of an intensive occupation at the end of the first Iron Age, during the 6th and 5th c. B.C.

At that time the site was strongly fortified. A ditch with triangular section, 5 m deep and 19 m wide at the top, surrounded the mountain over a length of 2.7 km. Behind this ditch stood a strong vallum, still more than 3 m in high in places. This vallum is characterized by the presence of an internal facing consisting of an ashlar wall. Several large banks of earth led to the river and to spring, thereby protecting access to sources of water. The dwellings on the summit are poorly known because they are too disturbed, but remains of buildings have been excavated on the sides of the hill.
Reconstruction of wagon from Tomb of Vix in Burgundy (France), Greek Civilization, 6th Century BC

The cabins were built on small terraces with their backs against the rock wall. They were made of plastered wattling and their floors were carefully smoothed; stone was not used. After being abandoned during the 4th, 3d, and 2d c. B.C., the site was reoccupied during La Tène III and a rampart of murus gallicus type enclosed the summit of the upper plateau. Gallo-Roman dwellings on this plateau and a Merovingian cemetery on the other attest to the permanency of human occupation.
Mont-Lassois' interest lies in the abundance and significance of the archaeological material which has been collected there. Almost all fibula types of the end of the first Iron Age are represented there. More than 2 million potsherds dating to about 500 B.C. have been recovered, including 40,000 with geometric barbotine decoration. The remains of more than 50 black-figure Greek vases attest to the existence of a Greek colonization.

In 1953 an exceptionally rich princely tomb was found at the foot of Mont-Lassois. Originally it was a large barrow with a diameter of 40 m. In the middle, in a funerary chamber cut into the ground and lined with planks, lay the dismounted remains of a wagon in whose chassis the body of a young woman had been placed.
The grave goods consisted of an enormous bronze crater 1.65 m high, weighing 208 kg, two Attic bowls, an ancient greek silver vial with a gold navel, three ancient greek bronze basins, and an Etruscan bronze wine jug.

The jewelry included bronze and iron fibulas adorned with gold, amber, and coral; a bronze torque, amber beads, a schist bracelet, and bronze ankle bracelets. A gold diadem weighing 480 gr, of Greek workmanship, still rested on the head of the deceased. This tomb has been dated to 500 B.C. It should be compared to the two barrows of Sainte-Colombe, located 1 km away, which also contained wagon burials attributable to the Greek princes of Vix.

The location of the necropoleis corresponding to the settlement still is not known. However, in the vicinity of the tomb of the princess at Vix, recent excavations have revealed numerous circular enclosures, funerary structures contemporary to that tomb.

Mont-Lassois' importance can be explained by its geographical position. It is located next to the Seine, just where it ceases to be navigable. Thus, it effectively controlled passage through the valley and commercial traffic, including the tin trade.

All the archaeological material collected on the site is deposited in the Musée Municipal at Châtillon-sur-Seine.

In the area, as elsewhere in Central and Western Europe, the early Iron Age led to changes in social organisation, including a marked tendency toward the development of social hierarchies. Whereas large open settlements previously had served as central places, smaller enclosed settlements developed, often in locally prominent locations (so called manors or princely sites). They probably housed an aristocracy that had developed in the context of the increasingly important trade in iron ore and iron. Whether they really were "princesses" or "princes" in a modern sense (i.e., a noble or religious aristocracy) or simply represented an economic or mercantile elite is still the subject of much discussion. In any case, the changed social conditions also were represented by richly equipped graves which are in sharp contrast to the preceding habit of uniform simple urn burials.

Several so-called Fürstensitze (a German term describing such sites, literally "princely seats") are known from Late Hallstatt and Early La Tène Europe, for example, the burials at Hochdorf and Magdalenenberg, the Heuneburg settlement and the Glauberg settlement and burial complex. They are suggested to indicate an increasing hierarchisation of society, with these sites representing the top level, an upper class that lived removed from the majority of the population, and engaged in different social and burial habits to stress its own status.

This separation was based on economic success, connected with the trade of the new dominant metal, namely iron. Iron ores were far more widespread than the rarer materials needed to produce the previously dominant bronze: copper, but especially, tin. Thus, economic success ceased to be determined simply by access to the raw materials, but started to depend on infrastructure and trade.

The increasing economic surplus in well-situated places was invested in representative settlements (and fortifications), jewellery, and expensive imported luxury materials, a differentiation not previously possible. These changes continued even after the end of life. The new social class was not buried in egalitarian urns without much accompanying material, but received individual and elaborate burial mounds as well as rich grave offerings.

Fortifications and architecture
Excavation of the settlement on the summit of Mont Lassois revealed extensive fortifications, with ditches and walls up to 8 m thick. The walls were built in the Pfostenschlitzmauer technique, but also yielded nails of the type common in murus gallicus walls. Excavation inside the enclosure revealed a variety of buildings, including post houses, pit dwellings, hearths, and storage units built on stilts. Geophysical work shows a large planned settlement, with a central, north–south axis and several phases of buildings.

The Greek "Palace of the Lady of Vix"
In 2006, a remarkable architectural unit was discovered at the centre of the site. It is a large complex of two or three buildings, the main one measuring 35 by 21 m, with an estimated height of 12 m: the dimensions of a modern church. The large hall had an apse at the back and a front porch in antis. Overall, the central unit resembles the megaron complex of early Greek architecture. Such a find is unprecedented in early Celtic Europe. Finds suggested domestic use or feasting uses. The structure has been described as the "Palace" of the Lady of Vix (Palais de la Dame de Vix).

The many individual finds from the Lassois oppidum clearly demonstrate the settlement's long and wide-ranging trade contacts, as well as its own role as an economic centre. The most common finds are shards of pottery, with more than 40,000 recorded to date. Many are local products, decorated with simple geometric motifs (checkerboard patterns) and occasional depictions of animals. There also have been finds of imported Attic black figure vases from Greece. Many amphorae and bowls could be identified as coming from the contemporary Greek-settled areas of Southern France. The amphorae had been used for transporting wine.

Jewellery included fibulae, commonly decorated with amber or coral, earrings, beads, slate bracelets, and rings. Glass ornaments also were found. Some small bronze figurines found are Greek origin. Little weaponry has been found as yet, the majority of it projectiles and axes.

Mont Lassois has all the features of a high-status settlement: large fortifications, the presence of a citadel and a lower town, rare and fine imported materials, as well as numerous rich burial mounds in the vicinity.

Vix Grave
The burial of "the Lady of Vix" took place around 500 B.C. Although decomposition of the organic contents of the grave was nearly total, the gender of the individual buried has been interpreted as female: she is accompanied by many items of jewellery, but no weaponry.
Her social status is not clear and other than "Lady," names such as, Queen, Princess, or Priestess of Vix have all been used in various articles involving conjecture. There can be no doubt of her high status, as indicated by the large amounts of jewellery. She was between 30 years and 35 years old at the time of her death.

The inhumation burial was placed in a 4m x 4m rectangular wooden chamber underneath a mound or tumulus of earth and stone which originally measured 42m in diameter and 5m in height.

Her body was laid in the freestanding box of a cart, or chariot, the wheels of which had been detached and placed beside it. Only its metal parts have survived. Her jewellery included a 480 gram 24-carat gold torc, a bronze torc, six fibulae, six slate bracelets, plus a seventh bracelet made of amber beads.

The grave also contained an assemblage of imported objects from the Greek world, all of them associated with the preparation of wine. They included the famous krater, a silver phiale (shallow bowl, sometimes seen as a local product), an Etruscan bronze oinochoe (wine jug), and several drinking cups from Attica. One of the latter was dated as c. 525 BC and represents the latest firmly dated find in the grave. It thus provides the best evidence, a terminus post quem for its date. The vessels probably were placed on wooden tables or benches that did not survive

Vix Krater
The largest and most famous of the finds from the burial is an elaborately decorated bronze volute krater of 1.63m (5'4") height and over 200kg (450lbs) weight.
READ MORE ABOUT THE VIX KRATER HERE

Further tumuli
Apart from this woman's grave (mound I), there are five further known large burial mounds in the area. Three of them have been excavated so far.

Mound II had a diameter of 33 m; its central chamber contained an urn with cremated human remains, dated by accompanying finds to c. 850 BC.
The mound of La Butte probably dates to the mid-sixth century. As in its famous neighbouring grave, it contained a woman laid in a cart, or chariot, accompanied by two iron axes and a gold bracelet.
A third mound, at La Garenne, was destroyed in 1846. It, too, contained a cart, as well as an Etruscan bronze bowl with four griffin or lioness handles. It is not known whether it contained skeletal remains.


A GREEK TREASURE IN FRANCE
By Paul Lewis
Published: April 1, 1984
Herodotus, the Greek historian, tells of a bronze jar, or krater, so big that it could hold 300 amphorae of wine, the equivalent of nearly 300 gallons. Such a krater, he says, was made by the bronze smiths of Sparta for the fabulously rich King Croesus of Lydia, who reigned from 56O to 546 B.C., about a century before Herodotus was writing. 
For years, modern students of Greek history laughed off the tale of the huge vessel as a typical piece of Herodotean exaggeration. . Kraters were decorated bronze pots in which the ancient Greeks mixed water with their syrupy wine before drinking it. Many such vessels have been found, but they are only a fraction of the size of the one Herodotus mentions and were clearly intended to stand in the middle of a dining table. They served as a punch bowl, allowing feasters to ladle the wine into cups. 
One cold January morning in 1953, near the village of Vix in the Burgundy region of France, Rene Joffroy, a local archeologist, scratched away some mud at a site he was excavating and found a grinning Gorgon sticking her tongue out at him from the handle of an immense bronze jar. Mr. Joffroy had discovered the Krater of Vix, the largest known vessel from the ancient world, and one that corresponds exactly in size, age and magnificence to the jar Herodotus described. (However, whether this krater really is the lost vessel the historian refers to will probably never be known.) 
Today, this superbly decorated krater, over five feet high and capable of holding nearly 300 gallons of wine, stands three miles from Vix in the tiny Municipal Museum at Ch^atillon-sur-Seine, surrounded by the other extraordinary treasures discovered with it. (Ch^atillon-sur-Seine is 45 miles northwest of Dijon.) The museum, in an old house in the center of the town, has an American connection. A plaque just inside the door records that the building was restored in 1951 with a gift of money collected in the United States by a committee headed by Mrs. W. V. Cotchett. About 20,000 visitors a year make their way to see the restored Vix Krater, although in winter the unheated museum is cheerless, cold and empty. 
The vessel, decorated in the Spartan style, stands in an upstairs room, glowing a deep turquoise green. Two handles rise well above the lip, each in the form of a ferocious-looking Gorgon with protruding tongue and legs that turn into curling serpents. Around the neck of the krater marches a frieze of ancient Greek warriors on the their way to battle. Some stride forward on foot carrying hugh circular shields, while others ride in little chariots. All wear high plumed helmets with big cheek guards. Each figure was cast by the ''the lost wax'' method, meaning it was modeled individually. 
Displayed separately from the krater is its perforated lid, with a statue of a goddess in the center.
Wine was probably poured through this lid to strain out lumps of the pine resin Greeks still use as a preservative and which gives their wine its distinctive flavor. The several wine cups found in the krater included one of silver and another decorated with distinctive spiky black pictures of ancient warriors that enable experts to place it as Athenian work made some time between 530 and 520 B.C.
 
The pleasure of seeing the piece does not come just from admiring its shape and decoration. It stems also from puzzling over the astonishing picture the vessel provides of France 2,500 years ago. 
Ch^atillon-sur-Seine is a backwater, a small, not even attractive provincial town in a region few people have reason to visit. The chateaus of the Loire are well to the west, the spas and wooded hills of the Vosges to the north, the bucolic delights of Dijon, Beaune and Lyons farther south. The motorways, spreading out from Paris, miss it by a wide margin. France's new high-speed train also gives Ch^atillon a comfortable berth. ''Even the ordinary passenger trains don't stop here any more,'' says Andre Paris, the museum director. 
Yet the krater is a reminder that the Ch^atillon-sur-Seine area must have been a special place in ancient times. The vessel is merely part of the rich tomb furniture of a Celtic princess, who was buried there, sitting upright in a chariot of wood bound with bronze, around the year 500 B.C. 
The woman, who was about 30 years old when she died, had a long thin skull and poor teeth. But the objects buried with her and which are all displayed with the krater in the museum, not only show that she was rich and powerful but that she was able to accumulate treasures from the farthest corners of the known world. Her body was bedecked with jewelry, including necklaces of rich amber gathered on the shores of the Baltic, Iron Age brooches and Etruscan rings. Her hair was held in place by a magnificent diadem of pure gold, 17 ounces in weight, and, like the krater itself, without equal in the ancient world. Probably of Greek or Syrian origin, this diadem takes the form of a thick curved band of gold ending in two knobs that went in front of the wearer's ears. Each knob was supported by a lion's paw and decorated with a tiny winged Pegasus. 
The Vix tomb lay at the foot of Mont Lassois, a hill commanding the Seine River and was heavily fortified by Celtic tribes until they abandoned it about 480 B.C. Since the Seine is navigable from present-day Le Havre down as far as Vix, the Celtic warlords of Mont Lassois controlled one of the great trade routes of the ancient world. Tin from the mines of Cornwall, England - along with furs, amber, wood and other northern products - was transported down the Seine, on its way to be smelted into bronze in Greece. 
This trade was probably particularly heavy around the year 500 B.C. when the princess died, for there is evidence that Phoenician pirates, based near the Strait of Gibraltar, succeeded at that time in closing off the sea route from Greece to Britain and the north, forcing merchants to go overland. The local Celtic chieftains must have levied a heavy tribute on this trade as it passed through their kingdom. The magnificent krater buried with the princess at Vix, her golden diadem and all her other possessions from faraway lands, were probably paid to her husband or father by merchants. 
Certainly, many less valuable objects from Greece and southern Europe were also found in the ruins of the ancient Celtic fort on top of Mont Lassois. In addition, similar Greek artifacts have been discovered along a trail of archeological sites stretching to the southeast of Vix and into Switzerland, suggesting the route the traders took. 
The krater is a reminder that a barbarian woman living in this part of France 2,500 years ago may in some ways have led a more sophisticated and cosmopolitan existence than most of the local women a visitor passes in the streets today.

Source/Photography/Bibliography

R. Joffroy, La tombe de Vix, Monuments et Mém. (fondation Piot) (1954); L'Oppidum de Vix et la civilisation hallstattienne finale dans l'Est de la France (1960); Les Influences méditerranéennes dans l'oppidum de Vix et dans l'Est de la France à la fin du 1er âge du Fer, Institut de Préhist. et d'Arch. des Alpes Maritimes (1960).
R. JOFFROY
The Princeton encyclopedia of classical sites. Stillwell, Richard. MacDonald, William L. McAlister, Marian Holland. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press. 1976.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this tex
René Joffroy : Le Trésor de Vix (Côte d’Or). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1954.
René Joffroy: Das Oppidum Mont Lassois, Gemeinde Vix, Dép Côte-d’Or. In: Germania 32, 1954, pp. 59-65.
René Joffroy: L’Oppidum de Vix et la civilisation Hallstattienne finale dans l’Est de la France. Paris 1960.
https://en.wikipedia.org
René Joffroy: Le Trésor de Vix. Histoire et portée d’une grande découverte. Fayard, Paris 1962.
René Joffroy: Vix et ses trésors. Tallandier, Paris 1979.
Franz Fischer: Frühkeltische Fürstengräber in Mitteleuropa. Antike Welt 13, Sondernummer. Raggi-Verl., Feldmeilen/Freiburg. 1982.
Bruno Chaume: Vix et son territoire à l’Age du fer: fouilles du mont Lassois et environnement du site princier. Montagnac 2001, ISBN 2-907303-47-3.
Bruno Chaume, Walter Reinhard: Fürstensitze westlich des Rheins, in: Archäologie in Deutschland 1, 2002, pp. 9–14.
Claude Rolley (ed.): La tombe princière de Vix, Paris 2003, ISBN 2-7084-0697-3
Vix, le cinquantenaire d’une découverte. Dossier d’Archéologie N° 284, Juin 2003.
Bruno Chaume/Tamara Grübel et al.: Vix/Le mont Lassois. Recherches récentes sur le complexe aristocratique. In: Bourgogne, du Paléolithique au Moyen Âge, Dossiers d’Archéologie N° Hors Série 11, Dijon 2004, pp. 30-37.

Ίσσα, Κροατία

Το Βις, (κροατικά: Vis) είναι η Ίσσα των αρχαίων και είναι νησί της Κροατίας στην Αδριατική Θάλασσα. Έχει έκταση 89,7 τ.χλμ. και 3.617 κατοίκους σύμφωνα με την απογραφή του 2001. Πρωτεύουσα του νησιού είναι η Βις με 1.960 κατοίκους.



Η συλλογή των αμφορέων στο νησί Vis, αρχαία ελληνική αποικία Ίσσα, Κροατία

Τον 4ο αιώνα π.Χ., ο Έλληνας τύραννος των Συρακουσών, Διονύσιος ο Πρεσβύτερος, ίδρυσε την αποικία Ίσσα στο νησί της σημέρινης Βίς στην Κροατία. Αργότερα, έγινε μια ανεξάρτητη πόλη, έκοβε δικά της χρήματα και ίδρυσε τις δικές της αποικίες, το πιο αξιοσημείωτη από την Ασπάλαθο (η σύγχρονη πόλη του Σπλιτ).

Κατά τη διάρκεια του 3ου αιώνα η Ίσσα ίδρυσε το Τραγούριον  (σήμερα Τρογκίρ) και την Επίδαυρο (Στομπρετς / Stobreč) στην ηπειρωτική χώρα Ιλλυναν.

Η πόλη, που βρίσκεται σε μια πλαγιά ενός μεγάλου κόλπου, και υπερασπίστηκε από ισχυρά ελληνιστικά τείχη, ακόμα ορατά σε ένα ακανόνιστο τετράπλευρο (265 x 360 μ) που περικλείεται σε μια έκταση 9,8 εκταρίων. Πλέγμα δρόμων και θεμέλια σπιτιών έχουν βρεθεί, ενώ η νεκρόπολη  της πόλης απέφερε πολλά κομμάτια αγγείων, συμπεριλαμβανομένων μερικών από την Ν. Ιταλία.

Στον 1ο αιώνα π.Χ., το νησί το κατέχουν οι Λιβυρνοί. Η σημαντικότητα της Ίσσα έληξε με την συμμετοχή της στον πρώτο Ιλλυρικό-ρωμαϊκό πόλεμο (29-219 π.Χ.). Αφού τάχθηκε με τους Πομπεύεις κατά τη διάρκεια της περιόδου των εμφυλίων της Ρώμης. Τελικά έγινε τμήμα της Ρωμαϊκής αυτοκρατορίας το 47 π.Χ..

Μέχρι το 1797, το νησί ήταν υπό την κυριαρχία της Δημοκρατίας της Βενετίας. Κατά τη διάρκεια αυτής της περιόδου μεγάλοι οικισμοί αναπτύχθηκαν κατά μήκος της ακτογραμμής [(Κομισα, σήμερα Komiža) και Lissa (σήμερα Vis)]. Διοικητικά, το νησί της Ίσσα ήταν για αιώνες συνδεδεμένο με το νησί την Λεσσίνα.

History
Η ελληνική πόλη της Ίσσα βρίσκεται στο νησί Βις στην κεντρική Δαλματία στην νότια Κροατία. Η ίδρυσή της συνδέεται με τις δραστηριότητες του Διονυσίου του Πρεσβύτερου των Συρακουσών κατά την έναρξη του 4ου αι. Π.Χ

Υπάρχουν ακόμη κάποιες διαφωνίες μεταξύ των μελετητών σχετικά με την ημερομηνία της ίδρυσής της Ίσσα, λόγω διαφορετικών ερμηνειών της περιγραφής του Διόδωρου του Σικελιώτη στην σύγκρουση μεταξύ Ελλήνων από το νησί της Πάρου στο Αιγαίο και των αυτοχθόνων πληθυσμών από το γειτονικό νησί Χβάρ.

 

View of the ruins of the walls of Issa (4th/3rd cc. B.C.)




Source/Photography/Bibliography

An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis: An Investigation Conducted by The Copenhagen Polis Centre for the Danish National Research Foundation by Mogens Herman Hansen, 2005, Index
The Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites (eds. Richard Stillwell, William L. MacDonald, Marian Holland McAllister), ISSA (Vis) Croatia. 
Wilkes, J. J. The Illyrians, 1992, ISBN 0-631-19807-5, page 183, "
Jefford, Wing Commander C.G., MBE,BA,RAF (Retd). RAF Squadrons, a Comprehensive Record of the Movement and Equipment of all RAF Squadrons and their Antecedents since 1912. Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing, 2001. ISBN 1-84037-141-2.
The "Tin-opener". No 6 Squadron (RAF ) Association Newsletter. July 2014.
Council on Books in Wartime, and Robert O. Ballou. A History of the Council on Books in Wartime, 1942-1946. 1946. Page 81.
(Croatian) First Croatian online peljar
Jefford, Wing Commander C.G., MBE,BA,RAF (Retd). RAF Squadrons, a Comprehensive Record of the Movement and Equipment of all RAF Squadrons and their Antecedents since 1912. Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing, 2001. ISBN 1-84037-141-2.
The "Tin-opener". No 6 Squadron (RAF ) Association Newsletter. July 2014.

Issa (Vis), Croatia

Vis (Ancient Greek: Ἴσσα; Latin: Issa, Italian: Lissa) is a small Croatian island in the Adriatic Sea. The farthest inhabited island off the Croatian mainland, Vis had a population of 3,617 in 2011. Vis has an area of 90.26 square kilometres (34.85 square miles). The highest point of the island is Hum which is 587 metres (1,926 feet) above sea level.


The island's two largest settlements are the town of Vis on the eastern side of the island (the settlement after which the island was originally named), and Komiža, on its western coast.

Once known for its thriving fishing industry in the late 19th and early 20th century, the main present-day industries on the island are agriculture and tourism. Vis town and Komiža are also seats of separate administrative municipalities which cover the entire island and nearby islets, which are both part of Split-Dalmatia County.
Collection of amphoras on Island of Vis, ancient Greek colony Issa, today Croatia

In the 4th century BC, the Greek tyrant of Syracuse, Dionysius the Elder, founded the colony Issa on the island. Later, it became an independent polis, and even minted its own money and founded its own colonies, the most notable of which was Aspálathos (the modern-day city of Split). 

During the 3rd century Issa founded the emporia Tragurion (Traù, now Trogir) and Epetion (Stobreč) on the Illynan mainland.

The town, situated on a slope on the W side of a large bay, was defended by strong Hellenistic walls, still visible in an irregular quadrangle (265 x 360 m) that enclosed an area of 9.8 ha. The street grid and foundations of houses have been found. The necropolis has yielded many pieces of pottery, including some from S Italy.

In the 1st century BC, the island was held by the Liburnians.  Its importance in the region ended with the first Illyro-Roman war (29-219 BC). Having sided with Pompeus during the period of civil struggles in Rome, became an "oppidum civium Romanorum" in 47 BC.

Until 1797, the island was under the rule of the Republic of Venice. During this time large settlements developed along the coastline (Comisa (now Komiža) and Lissa (now Vis)). Administratively, the island of Lissa was for centuries bound to the island of Lesina, now named Hvar. 

The Venetian influence is still recognizable in architecture found on the island, and some vocabulary of the Croatian dialect spoken locally are Venetian in origin.

After the short-lived Napoleonic Kingdom of Italy, with Italian as the official language, the island was ruled by the Austrian Empire since 1814. It maintained its Italian name of Lissa. After the end of World War I, it was under Italian rule again in the period from 1918 to 1921, according to the provisions of the 1915 Treaty of London, before it was ceded to Kingdom of Yugoslavia as part of the 1920 Treaty of Rapallo.

History
The Greek city of Issa is situated on the island of Vis1in Central Dalmatiain southern Croatia . Its foundation is associated with activities of Dionysius the Elder of Syracuse at the beginning of the 4th c. BC. 
Before the establishment of the Greek colony, in the Archaic and Classical periods, an indigenouscommunity on the island of Vis had commercial contact with the Greeks, as the findings from theseperiods confirm (see: KIRIGIN 2008 and literature cited there). The Corinthian aryballoi and Black-fig-ured vessels were, unfortunately, found without archaeological context, but it is believed that they werepart of a tomb near Gradina in Vis. This could indicate the existence of indigenous settlements onGradina before the foundation of the Greek colony of Issa, but archaeological excavations have notyet confirmed this. During the Adriatic Island Project (KIRIGIN –VUJNOVIC´– CˇACˇE– GAFFNEY –PODOBNIKAR – STANCˇIC´–BURMAZ 2006) an intensive survey of the island was conducted, and most ofthe finds on the island can be dated to the Hellenistic period, indicating that during that period the is-land was densely populated (KIRIGIN – KATUNARIC´–ŠESˇELJ 2005, 7-21).
There are stillsome disagreements among scholars on the date of Issa’s foundation due to dif-ferent interpretations of Diodorus Siculus’s description of a conflict between Greeks from the island of Paros in the Aegean and indigenous people when es-tablishing the colony on the neighbouring island of Hvar. 

According to Diodorus Siculus, Dionysius the Elder established the colony Lissos, from which he assist-ed the Parians in establishing the colony of Pharos on Hvar (Diod. XV 13, 4; XV14, 2). Diodorus denoted Dionysius colony as Lissos and not Issa, which hascaused disagreement. Some scholars believe that the name of the founded colonywas incorrectly written as Lissos, instead of Issa, and that Dionysius the Elderfounded a colony on the island of Vis before the Parians established the colonyof Pharos. 

To confirm this thesis they refer to the great distance between Pharosand Lissos (today’s Lezhë) in Albania, a three-to-four days voyage that wouldprevent Dionysius coming quickly to assist. The counter argument is that, so far,archaeological excavations in Issa have not yet revealed any material evidencefrom the beginning of the 4th c. BC. 

Unfortunately, archaeological evidence from Lissos is not helping either, since the oldest material that has been so far foundin Lezhë is dated to the last third of the 4th c. BC. So, the date of the foundationof the Greek colony of Issa still remains open. However, Ps. Skylax wrote in themid-4th c. BC that Issa was a Greek city (Ps. Skylax Periplous 23). 

Another liter-ary source from the 1st c. BC refers to Issa as Syracusan colony (Ps. SkymnosPeriegesis 405-414)2. The Greek colony of Issa is located on the western side of Vis bay, on the terracedslopes of the hill Gradina. The position of the city was chosen because of maritimecharacteristics, as the small peninsula Prirovo protects the harbour from the northwind that is in this area the most dangerous, especially during the winter.
A grave stele (or tombstone) from Vis, Greek Issa, in the Archaeological Museum at Split. The inscription, from the 3rd or 2nd century BC, names the deceased as Dionysios, son of Thrasymachos, and Teimasion, son of Dionysios.

The city is spread over about 8.5 km2and was protected by walls that rise fromthe sea at the Prirovo peninsula and stretch to the top of the hill Gradina. Alongthe eastern and western walls of the city are two necropoleis; in the southwest, inthe valley between the two hills of Bandirica and Gradina is the Martvilo necropo-lis, and on the east is the Vlaška njiva necropolis. 

Both necropoleis were excavated, but unfortunately not entirely published4. Remains of the port can be tracedover a length of more than one kilometre, from the southern part of the town,around the Prirovo peninsula to the bay of Stonca on the east of Vis bay.

For the last six years excavations have been conducted within the walls (intramuros) in the east part of ancient Issa. The results are impressive; following the lineof east town walls, two blocks of houses oriented northwest-southeast were exca-vated with a narrow street between them. 

The remains of pottery waste (poorlyfired potsherd of amphorae and terracotta figurines) and moulds near the necrop-olis at Vlaška njiva and remains of two pottery kilns on the Martvilo necropolishave been found. This archaeological evidence clearly indicates potters’ activity inIssa during Hellenistic and Roman period.

Although the exact date of foundation is still unknown and much speculated,archaeological evidence (and some literary sources) can offer us a good insight in-to Issa’s economic and political development during the Hellenistic period. Beingon the periphery of the Mediterranean world, Issa was vividly engaged in theHellenistic  koine through commercial trade and cultural exchanges. 

As already mentioned, so far archaeological evidence from both necropoleis and excavations conducted within the town walls (intra muros) can not offer us a closer look at Issa at the beginning of the 4th c. BC. However, from the mid-4th c. BC on the islandof Vis, and on the Dalmatian coast, an increase of imported pottery material canbe noticed.

There is no doubt that the established colonies of Issa and Pharos im-ported and distributed Hellenistic goods to indigenous communities in the hinter-land of the eastern Adriatic, especially from the Greek colony of Taras (todayTaranto) in South Italy. Apulian red figured vessels such as hydriai, lebetesgamikoi and lekanai, dated to the mid-4th c. BC, were found, unfortunately with-out archaeological context, but it is believed that they were part of an assemblageof early tombs in the necropolis at Martvilo. 

Beside imports of red figured ves-sels, vessels of Apulian Gnathia pottery had found a wide market not only in Issa,but along the East Adriatic coast, where they have been documented in numeroussites. 

From Taras workshops vessels of the Dunedin and Alexandrian groups ofGnathia pottery were found, but most of the imported Gnathia  vessels in Issa came from a workshop in Canosa in north Apulia9which was established around 330 BC. 

Because of strong resemblance between Canosan and local IssaeanGnathia vessels, Green and Kirigin assumed that Canosan potters moved to Issaaround the mid-3rd c. BC and established a pottery workshop. 



The connections with South Italian colonies (mainly Taras and less Metapontum or others) and set-tlements (Canosa) at the beginning of the Hellenistic period were encouraged bycommercial trade. Issa based its economy on wine production and trade. 

According to theAlexandrian historian and geographer Agatharchides, who flourished in the 2nd c.BC, wine from Issa was «superior to every other wine whatsoever». His testimony is important given that he was born in Cnidus: the city established a colony onthe island of Korkyra Melaina near to Issa14, or he might have tasted Issaean winein Alexandria. 

The large quantities of amphorae found on the island of Vis weremainly concentrated around the fertile fields in the inland and near the port16. Inaddition, fragments of poorly fired amphorae found near Vlaška njiva indicate thatIssa produced amphorae – containers for the exportation of wines. 

Issa’s econom-ic rise was accompanied by political expansion to the neighbouring islands andcoast. It is believed that Issa established some kind of political alliances with indige-nous settlements in Tragyrion/Tragurion – Τραγύριον/Τραγούριον (today Trogir 20 km west from Split) and Epetion – Ἐπέτιον (today Stobrecˇ, east suburb of Split). 

These two cities are situated by fertile fields in Kaštela bay, and nearthe saddle of Klis, a natural communication with hinterland and therefore a goodtrade route with indigenous communities. 

This commercial route had its beginningin Salonae, as Strabo mentions it as a port of the Dalmatians, an indigenous com-munity that inhabited inland of today’s Central Dalmatia.

According to the inscription on the psephisma found on the small hill ofKoludrt in Lumbarda on the island of Korcˇula, ancient Κέρĸυρα Μέλαινα, it isbelieved that Issa founded a colony there to control a maritime route through the Pelješac channe. 

The Issaean population established at Lumbarda belonged to three Dorian tribes, Dymanes, Pamphyloi and Hylleis, found only inthe Peloponnesus and their colonies. The names of the Issaeans settled in Lumbarda, attested on the psephisma, were of typical Greek origin (mainly fromSicily and South Italy and some from Corinthian colonies).Since maritime trade was of vital economic importance for Issa, the piracy clearly was a large issue for Issaean tradesmen. 

So, in order to end the pillagesof their trade ships, Issaeans turned to the Roman Senate for assistance. During the3rd c. BC the Roman Republic was widely engaged in military operations in SouthItaly, but had an interest in the East Adriatic as well. By the end of the 3rd c. BC,the Romans began military actions in Central Dalmatia – the Illyrian wars, in 229 and 219 BC – and Issa became a Roman ally. 

With the increasingly powerful Rome on its side, Issa could expand its economic and political influence on theneighbouring islands and coast. In the neighbouring colony of Pharos, the political and economic situation was different. During the 4th and 3rd c. BC Pharos developed economically, but after the second Illyrian war in 219 BC, when Roman troops defeated the army of Demetrius of Pharos and destroyed the town walls, Pharos was no longer an important town. Although Issa had enjoyed the protection of powerful Rome, it looks as if the situation by the end of the 3rd c. BC in Apulia did affect Issaean trade. 

From that time, imports of Apulian pottery de-creased, which can be understood given that in that period pottery production in Apulia and Taranto underwent a period of crisis due to the political situation andthe Roman conquest of South Italy. 

One historical event played probably the crucial role in the development of Issaean economy: in 216 BC Hannibal’ s conquest of the Canosan port of Cana caused the cessation of imports of Canosan merchandise in the East Adriatic and in Issa. Potters were no longer relying on the imitation of Apulian pottery – primarily Gnathia vessels –, but they had developed their own type of pottery in Gnathia tradition and they began to export it to neighbouring islands and the coast of Central Dalmatia. Issaean Gnathia vessels have been found in Tragurion, Epetion, in the Hellenistic port of Resnik, on Cape Ploca (Promunturium Diomedis), and, unfortunately without archaeological context, in Lumbarda.

On the east side of the Vis bay and on the east of Issa’s town wall and the necropolis at Vlaška njiva is a small bay called Stonca. During the clearing of the field for setting up electricity pylons in 1960, workers discovered a tomb completely overgrown with vegetation. 

Since the tomb was located about 1 kmfrom the necropolis at Vlaška njiva and was found isolated, or at least other graveswere not found in its vicinity, we cannot associate it with the burials in the necrop-olis at Vlaška njiva. 

The tomb laid in the northeast-southwest, although it shouldbe noted that such an orientation was most likely due to the geological structure ofthe slope where the tomb was found. It was covered with several large stone slabsand a number of small irregularly shaped stones. The dry-walled trapezoid shapeof the tomb measured 0.70 to 0.77 m wide, and 1.65 to 1.70 m long. At the time ofopening, the tomb was filled with layers of washed earth, pieces of stones from thecover, jumbled bones and 18 pottery vessels. 

Among the bones three skulls werefound, indicating burial of three adults. The bones, as well as the grave goods, werelocated predominantly on one side of the tomb, probably due to water penetratingthrough the rock on one side. Despite the relatively large number of pottery vessels that are well-preserved, noother object was found. 

The pottery inventory of the tomb consists of sevenunguentaria, three oinochoai, one Black glazed pyxis, one pyxis with lid, one smallpelike, one askos, one double cruet, one bottle, one plate, one filter jug,and a fragment of the lid of one spherical vessel. Željko Rapanic´, former curatorof the Greek and Hellenistic Collection at Archaeological Museum in Split, pub-lished the tomb in Stonca bay in 1960 and dated it to the first half of the 3rd c. BC.

He actually described the tomb and the vessels and provided one parallel for eachof the three shapes of vessels, the plate, the askos and the unguentaria. Regarding the provenance of the vessels, he attributed the double cruet and the plate to workshops from Greece, while the pelike, the piriform oinochoe, the guttusaskos and the trefoil bell-shaped oinochoe to Gnathia produc-tion. 

Since that time, surprisingly the tomb has not attracted much attention from scholars, although new data on pottery material from Issa, as well as from other sites in the Mediterranean, especially in mainland Greece, has emerged. 

New data allows detailed analysis of pottery materials and sheds a new light on the interpre-tation of the tomb in Stonca bay. A different date is proposed for the tomb whilethe vessels are attributed to various workshops.

Description - Monument
Unfortunately, lots of remains were destroyed due to lack of experts’ supervision, wars or just ignorance (carelessness). An interesting example is that the Allied British Army used that area for military parking space. Nevertheless, all left and preserved of heritage witnesses about the life of that time. Archeologists still work hard on excavating an Issaic Street and other findings. You can visit Martvilo, the only ancient Greek cemetery in Croatia (located above the sports playgrounds). Most of objects are kept in the Archeological Museum in Vis and Split. In fact, the best preserved Issa ruins are those from the Roman times. 

Town Walls
As well as other Greek towns, Issa was also surrounded by walls which partially saved it on the western, northern and eastern parts of the former town located on the Gradina (Fortress) slopes.
As far as the town wall on the southern side is concerned, we are not certain it actually existed. Probably the walls were located some ten metres from the current coast line but – as it seems – after Issa lost its independence, these were destroyed, so that in the Roman period the town was completely open and free in the direction of the port and the sea.
View of the ruins of the walls of Issa (4th/3rd cc. B.C.)

The Issa town walls were preserved mostly in the lower layers of their construction. The walls were 2.4 m wide and the construction technique used was the "emplecton" method where the external and internal façade were constructed of larger stone blocks whilst the interior was filled with rough stones.

The remains of the town's streets
Apart from the lowest part of the town – which can seen in the description of the large town thermae – up until today have the exact material remains of ancient Issa streets have not been discovered nor have any other elements (town doors, squares and other such things) which would represent a solid base for conclusions with regard to the urban town scheme. However, there are a number of clues from which a hypothesis with regard to the hypodamic system of creating the urban space could be set up, that is, the hypothesis that Issa had a regular layout of town streets that crossed amongst themselves at right angles.
With regard to the circumstances that ancient Issa emerged on the terrace configuration of the southern slopes of present day Gradina, the traversal town roads, leading from east to west, passed through a single terrace whose antique supporting masonry has partially been preserved until the present. As far as the streets leading from south to north are concerned, that is, those leading from the town port to the peak of the settlement, the problems with terraced levels were certainly resolved with steps. In the same way as current problems, occurring in settlements constructed on steep terrain are resolved. One of the typical examples today is the town of Vis itself.

Supporting Masonry of terraces in the southern part of the town
Issa was built on the slopes of a hill that climbs down on terraces towards the sea. The supporting walls of these terraces have, in some places, been preserved until today. The best preserved parts are the ones of the lowest terrace located around fifty metres from the present coastline. Here of particular interest are the important remains of supporting walls in the eastern part, from the left side of today's field path which – when coming from Prirovo – climb towards the upper part of Gradina. The already mentioned 60 metre long remains can be seen here and these are the exact dimensions of the gap in the two town streets it is presumed were here originally.

Thermae
Amongst the architectural curiosities located between the illustrated supporting masonry and the sea shore are the remains of the large public thermae whose several metres high walls were destroyed completely at the end of the Second World War, in 1944. In 1963, archaeologists found - although still incomplete – the eastern part of this facility which as regards Issa spatial conditions were of very impressive dimensions. A pavement was also discovered on the northern part of the thermae.

Part of it was discovered on the north-eastern side as well but it would appear that this could also be the pavement to an open courtyard within the thermal baths themselves as there is a direct entrance to the room which once served as a dressing room (apodyterium). This can be seen in the traces of constructed benches and in the holes used for leaving clothes and footwear. From the dressing room onwards was the entrance to a large room whose borders have not been defined and whose floor was covered with geometric motive mosaic. Precisely in the passage to the north-eastern part of this large hall in mosaic are four blue dolphins on a white background.

The remains of residential architecture
Issa's residential building is still not recognizable enough, but in this kind of polis most probably the type of one-floor building with modest ground plan dimensions prevailed. This conclusion is drawn from the traces of house foundations which can still be seen in several places in the area of Gradina.

Theater
From the Issa's former theatre, built on the small peninsula of Prirovo, only a few details can still be seen today, such as those from the 16th century, where a church and Franciscan monastery was built above its remains. At the end of 19th century the Vis amateur-archaeologist, Apolonije Zanella did some research on the theatre area and as a result of his research made the plan of the facility public.
Issa's theatre, as with all antique theatres, had an auditorium, an orchestra area, a proscenium and a main stage. The auditorium (theatron, cavea) in Issa's theatre had 20 rows of stone seats which were set concentrically one above the other. The total length of the rows was 1,100 metres which means that it was able to accommodate around three thousand spectators.
The semicircular area was used as the orchestra pit on which firstly the choir performed but then lost that function during the Roman period. The dimensions of the area were reduced and turned from a horse-shoe into a semi-circle form which was also the case in Issa. Spectators entered the theatre through the hall (parodoi) at the edge of the orchestra pit and then from there they climbed up the steps to their seats.
Behind the orchestra was the proscenium in which actors played their roles and the theatre building, the so called scene which from the decorations on its facade represented the architectonically articulated and, very often, luxuriously decorated stage. On the scene façade were three doors through which actors came out to the proscenium stage.

The necropolis of Issa
The Necropolis, that is, ancient Issa's cemetery, was located outside the western town walls; in the area which was given the Slavic name Martvilo precisely because during the intense digging, graves were found.
A large part of Issa's tombs were searched and destroyed without archaeological control and records. The exceptions are a number of tombs researched by the Split Archaeological Museum in 1955 which represent the main source for the recognition of the funerary praxis of the Hellenistic period in Issa.

The tomb in Stonca bay
The tomb in Stonca bay near ancient Issa (today the town of Vis) on the island of Vis in mid-Dalmatia, on southern Croatia, was published by Željko Rapanic´ in 1960 when he was curator of the Greek and Hellenistic Collection at Archaeological Museum in Split. Since that time the tomb in Stonca has not attracted much attention from scholars. This was mainly because there was not enough data to make a comparative analysis of tomb’s assemblage, and because the tomb in Stonca, although located nearby, was not part of the necropolis at Vlaška njiva that was excavated in 1981. The distance between the tomb and Vlaška njiva necropolis is almost 1 km. Now, 45 years later, we are able to give more detailed analysis of the tomb assemblage and offer a new interpretation of the tomb.


Source/Photography/Bibliography

An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis: An Investigation Conducted by The Copenhagen Polis Centre for the Danish National Research Foundation by Mogens Herman Hansen, 2005, Index
The Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites (eds. Richard Stillwell, William L. MacDonald, Marian Holland McAllister), ISSA (Vis) Croatia. 
Wilkes, J. J. The Illyrians, 1992, ISBN 0-631-19807-5, page 183, "
Jefford, Wing Commander C.G., MBE,BA,RAF (Retd). RAF Squadrons, a Comprehensive Record of the Movement and Equipment of all RAF Squadrons and their Antecedents since 1912. Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing, 2001. ISBN 1-84037-141-2.
The "Tin-opener". No 6 Squadron (RAF ) Association Newsletter. July 2014.
Council on Books in Wartime, and Robert O. Ballou. A History of the Council on Books in Wartime, 1942-1946. 1946. Page 81.
(Croatian) First Croatian online peljar
Jefford, Wing Commander C.G., MBE,BA,RAF (Retd). RAF Squadrons, a Comprehensive Record of the Movement and Equipment of all RAF Squadrons and their Antecedents since 1912. Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing, 2001. ISBN 1-84037-141-2.
The "Tin-opener". No 6 Squadron (RAF ) Association Newsletter. July 2014.

The Athenaeum

This is The Athenaeum which was founded in 1824 for gentlemen of a literary or scientific turn of mind.

This was built specifically to house the Club, the frieze at the top is a reproduction of the Elgin Marbles from the Parthenon in Athens and the gilded statue above the portico is the Greek goddess Pallas Athene.

Famous members have included Charles Dickens, the artist J.M.W.Turner, Charles Darwin and Lewis Carroll.

The Athenæum, which Richard Saul Wurman describes "as unforgetably beautiful" (51), faces what was originally The United Service Club by John Nash and Decimus Burton (1828), which was originally founded for military officers who had fought in the Napoleonic Wars and now houses the Institute of Directors. The Athenæum, as it turns out, also had a relation to Britain's conquest of Napoleon, for as Ian Jenkins of the British Museum, points out

The Athenæum was founded in 1824 as a 'Club for Literary and Scientific men and followers of the Fine arts.' The building rose in 1829-30 as part of the new civic architecture in Greek style by which London was embellished after the battle of Waterloo. Following the defeat of Napoloneon, whose ambition was to transfer Rome to Paris, Britannia Victrix had sought a different model from Antiquity by which to shape her capital city. She found it in the democratic society of Periclean Athens. On the balcony over the porch of the Athenæum, Pallas Athena — a close replica by E. H. Baily of the Athena Belletri — was set up to preside over Waterloo Place. She was the warrior goddess of wisdom and patron deity of ancient Athens. [p. 149] Inside, on the staircase, a copy of the Apollo Belvedere, commander of the nine muses, stands watch over this modern museion. In niches of the flank walks of the entrance hall were casts of two statues then as now, in the Louvre, the so-called Venus Genetrix and the Diane de Gabies.

Past members include Joseph Conrad, Charles Darwin, Charles Dickens, W. Holman Hunt, Thomas Huxley, Rudyard Kipling, Lord Leighton, John Ruskin, and many members of the Anglican clergy.

Joseph Hatton's Clubland (1890) on the Athenæum

"The Athenæum is the chief literary club of the metropolis. It is built upon part of the old courtyard of Carlton House. The architecture is of the Grecian order, severe and impressive. The frieze is copied from that of the Parthenon. It was the colossal figure of Minerva over the Roman Doric portico that inspired the epigram : —


"Ye travellers who pass by, just stop and behold, 
And see, don't you think it a sin, 
That Minerva herself is left out in the cold, 
While her owls are all gorging within.

"The figure is by Bailey, and is a fine example of his art. The hall is divided by scagliola columns and pilasters, the capitals being copied from the Choragic monument of Lysicrates. In this "exchange or lounge " (to (quote Timbs), "where the members meet," there are two fire-places; " over each of them, in a niche, is a statue — the 'Diana Robing' and the 'Venus Victrix,' selected by Sir Thomas Lawrence — a very fine contrivance for sculptural display." In the library hangs Sir Thomas's last work. It is a portrait of George IV. He was engaged upon it a few hours before he died. Among the many fine busts in the various rooms is Rysbach's Pope, and a fine study of Milton, presented by Anthony Trollope. Although the revival of Gothic architecture is just now a national sentiment, and is in keeping with the exigencies of our climate, one finds, in the best features of Grecian and Italian Art, much that is noble and elevating even under our grey and unsympathetic skies. The design of the Athenæum is a help to the dignity and repose which is characteristic not only of the exterior, but of the rooms in the house itself. If the members have collected a library that is said to be the best of its kind in London, the architect and decorator, repeating classic models, have enshrined the volumes with characteristic taste. It brings the admirer of all this sadly down to the realism of the outer street when one is told that a member, desirous to refer to the Fathers on a theological point, asked one of the officials if "Justin Martyr" was in the library, and was answered, "I don't think he's a member, sir, but I will refer to the list." [27-29]

The Plaster Busts at the Athenæum

There are ten bookcases in the Drawing Room at the Athenæum; on each of them there is a portrait bust of a distinguished man. The busts are life-size, made of plaster. Every man was pre-eminent in his respective professions and thus the room becomes a kind of Pantheon, or ‘Temple of Worthies’ representing a wide range of different arts and sciences.

The list below runs clockwise from the central fireplace. With each person is given his respective métier:

William Shakespeare
John Locke
Sir Isaac Newton
David Garrick
William Harvey
John Milton
Dr. Samuel Johnson
1st Earl of Mansfield
Sir Joshua Reynolds drama
philosophy
natural science
poetry, historical romance
acting
medicine
letters, lexicography
jusrisprudence
painting
The busts, with one exception, were made in 1830, but they were not in their present places before 1920, so the tidy arrangement we have today is not the original. Moreover, in this company Walter Scott is a stranger. He was a foundation Member of the Club and died in 1832, but his plaster portrait, which was was made later than the rest, it is not recorded at the Club until 1898. . The others were made in February 1830 by P Sarti of Dean Street, Soho, who was one of the most active of many plaster casters then working in London. Sarti’s account survives in the Club’s Archive, and from it we know that he supplied three more busts (which have been lLost), viz:

Sir Francis Bacon
Alexander Pope
Sir Christopher Wren philosophy
poetry
architecture
However, the full complement of busts at the Club, according to a Committee minute of 1833, also included:

Edmund Burke
John Flaxman statesmanship
sculpture
In 1833, there were fourteen busts, of which four – Bacon, Flaxman, Pope and Wren – have been lost. The bust of Burke was presented in January 1830, by the nephew of the sitter. However, it seems that in 1920 Burke was not considered appropriate for the vacant place among the Worthies, which was given to Sir Walter Scott.

No record has been found of any Committee choosing the portraits; it this must have taken place during the winter of 1829-30, when the interior of the Clubhouse was nearing completion. Who made the choice? Again there is no record, but the five Trustees made up a strong intellectual group. . The ubiquitous John Wilson Croker combined political activity with studies of history and art; Davies Gilbert was a botanist and geologist; the Earl of Aberdeen, philhellene scholar, was at the time Foreign Secretary and a future Prime Minister; Lord Farnborough was an acknowledged connoisseur of art and adviser to the King at Windsor Castle.

The fifth Trustee was the painter Sir Thomas Lawrence, President of the Royal Academy, and himself a collector of drawings. Among the Members, the sculptor Francis Chantrey, who was on a sub-committee, made ‘frequent suggestions for the decoration and internal arrangements’ (Tait p.19).


The Club had apparently decided against hanging oil paintings, and was already buying plaster statues for the Hall and Staircase (Tait pp. xix-xxii). It seems likely that the plaster busts were ordered specially to furnish the Drawing Room, and were carefully chosen for a Club dedicated to literature, the arts and science. . Letter Letters and poetry may seem a little over-represented, but the purpose, clearly, was to reflect a broad range of intellectual achievement in liberal and fine arts. . However, the fourteen plaster portraits appear to have been collected without any particular plan as to their placing.

Another interesting point is that these plaster casts were readily available. The process of making plaster casts is described later. Evidently, in 1830, a range of subjects such as these could be chosen without difficulty; Sarti will have had ready to hand a good collection of the moulds required. All the original plaster busts, including Burke, appear to be of the same manufacture, i.e. from Sarti’s own workshop. Each one rests on a name-tablet or label, which is a narrow horizontal fillet 1 inches high, with a scroll at each end. This feature was taken from ancient Roman busts., and From about 1740 the name-tablet was the fashion at Rome with sculptors and restorers like Cavaceppi and Albacini, and it was used in England by classically minded sculptors like Nollekens and Banks. However, after 1790 it was going out of fashion and is rarely found in the 19th century (though it appears on the Club’s marble bust of J .W. Croker). Sarti charged for ‘painting the names’ on the busts, but the busts have been overpainted in white gloss and the letters have been obscured. The names are now written on rather intrusive pieces of gilded wood which are firmly affixed and cannot safely be removed.

Each bust will also have stood on a circular base, or socle, nearly four inches high, which was of plaster and cast integrally with the name-tablet. An inventory dated 1939 describes the busts as being twenty-eight inches high, which indicates that then they were still on socles; without the socles, their average height is more or less twenty-four inches. The brutal removal of the socles therefore probably dates from after the 1939-45 War, and the gilded name plaques perhaps from the same period.

The bust of Burke, however, survives in its original state. As we have seen, the Club possessed it some days before the others. Sarti supplied for it a ‘pedestal’, or socle, to make it uniform with the rest. Burke’s socle has survived, with the inscription ‘BURKE’ in black paint, and it may well be the original white paint that remains on the surface. The hollowed back has the same character as the other busts, i.e. rough, showing how the wet plaster had fallen into the mould.

In this last particular the bust of Walter Scott is different, in that the hollowed back has been smoothed down. This indicates a later period and style of casting.

Sarti dated his bill 3rd February 1830, but two of the busts (Reynolds and Wren) were, we know, ordered a few weeks later. From the way Sarti has set out his account (Appendix I), it looks as though the Committee ordered the first nine busts on the list a bit rather earlier than 4th February 1830. A Committee minute tells us that the busts of Reynolds and Wren were ordered on 23 February (Appendix II); that of Garrick, who was less intellectual than the others, looks on Sarti’s bill looks like an afterthought. That leaves one unrecorded bust, that of the sculptor John Flaxman. Almost certainly this was a cast of the marble bust by E .H. Baily, which belonged to Sir Thomas Lawrence.

There is curiously little information in the Committee minutes, but it seems that very early on six of the dwarf cabinets shown in Decimus Burton’s approved drawings of 1829 (Tait, Pl. XX) were replaced by bookcases: four were on the east wall, and two flanked the South Library door. In 1833, two more bookcases were erected to stand either side of the Map Room (now the North Library). A Committee minute of 7 May 1833 gives in detail the arrangement of the fourteen busts round the room:

Book Cases near the Library
Bookcases near the Map Room
Brackets on each side the Centre Glass
On the Mantel Pieces at the end of the Room
Centre Pope — Locke
Johnson – Burke
Reynolds – Wren
Bacon - Newton
Shakespeare — Milton — Garrick — Harvey — Mansfield — Flaxman
So eight ‘Worthies’ were placed on eight bookcases, and the other six stood on brackets and chimneypieces. Most of the busts were grouped by pairs, Reynolds and with Wren, Shakespeare with Milton; but the four listed above in the bottom line did not ‘mate’ so readily, and were put on the bookcases on the east wall. The Club evidently owned more busts than it had places, and the result, using the mantelpieces, was not very orderly. Observe that in 1833 the named busts included Burke, but not Walter Scott.

This 1833 arrangement can be seen in the Club’s oil painting of 1836 by James Holland (Tait, Pl. XXI). The bookcases were about eight feet high, which is three feet less than today, and the busts will have loomed larger than they do now. This point is not unimportant because the casts are of high quality and had been made from well-known original portraits by distinguished sculptors. As they now stand, however, they look well enough from the floor.

Nineteenth-century Arrangement of the Busts

By the end of 1836 the ninth and tenth bookcases had been made, to stand either side of the central fireplace where previously Reynolds and Wren had stood on brackets. An Inventory of 1838 says there were sixteen busts (which were not named) in the Drawing Room, but that is hard to account for; only fourteen are documented, and no others seem to have been received by that time. Then, in 1845 the bookcases were all rebuilt as they remain today, i.e. nearly eleven feet high, by the cabinet maker William Holland and Sons of Marylebone Road (Holland later moved to Mount Street, and he compiled the Club’s 1866 Inventory).

About the same time, most of the busts were taken downstairs. Six wall brackets were put up in the Entrance Hall, one either side of each fireplace, and two on the west wall. In 1846 the bas-reliefs by Thorvaldsen of Morning and Night were ‘placed over the false doors right & left of the Stair-case’; those false doors have since been removed). The brackets were for Milton, Newton, Bacon, Wren, Shakespeare and Reynolds. Four more brackets in the Morning Room held Johnson, ‘Dryden’ (obviously an error for Locke), Pope and (presumably) Burke. The list omits Garrick, Harvey, Mansfield and Flaxman, which will have remained on the east wall of the Drawing Room.

The busts are mentioned in subsequent inventories, which give the number and location of busts, but not again by names until 1894. In 1856 there were twelve busts on brackets in the Staircase Hall and Morning Room, and none in the Drawing Room, so two appear to have been lost. Two more were missing in 1866, when there were four busts in the Morning Room and six in the ‘Lobby and Corridor’.

The ‘Lobby and Corridor’ were in the basement. By 1894 all the other plaster busts had joined the party in the basement, and there they remained for twenty-five years. In 1920 they were taken upstairs and put on top of the bookcases: all, that is, except Burke who remained down below. The movements are described in a scholarly 1939 Inventory compiled by H. Clifford Smith (see Appendix IV). At least, Smith gives the date as 1920; but in the photograph of the Drawing Room published in Humphry Ward’s History of the Athenaeum (1925), no busts are to be seen.

It seems that after 1866 plaster busts had no real place in the Club; indeed they may have been seen as a bit of an embarrassment. Yet somehow they survived, and in good condition too. Any damage seems to have happened after 1920, namely a coat of white gloss paint; the removal of socles and the imposition of gilded name labels (except on the bust of Burke).

The present placing of the ten busts, both as decoration and as iconic symbols of esteem, seems so logical that in retrospect it’s hard to understand why it took so long to achieve. They stand on the bookcases exactly like library busts, which by a long tradition were placed on the tops of shelves in college and private libraries.

The Tradition of Library Busts

In the seventeenth century it was already common practice to put busts of authors on the tops of library bookcases. Normally the portraits were of ancient writers, i.e. classical poets and philosophers, but by the eighteenth century they would also include modern authors. The busts might be of marble or plaster.

In Britain, three great libraries of the mid-eighteenth century had series of portrait busts, which are described by Malcolm Baker in his study of the Wren Library. At Trinity College, Dublin, marble busts of twelve literary figures, ancient and modern, and two benefactors were supplied in the 1740s; six were by Roubiliac and eight by Scheemakers. The two other libraries, which we shall describe in greater detail, are the Codrington Library at All Souls’, Oxford, and the Wren Library at Trinty College, Cambridge. All the plaster busts at Oxford, and probably all those at Cambridge, were made by John Cheere (1709-1787).

John was a younger brother of the distinguished sculptor Sir Henry Cheere. He worked principally in modelling and casting sculpture in plaster and lead, and was without doubt the most active of several eighteenth-century craftsmen in these media. As well as making statues and statuettes, John Cheere specialised in portrait heads both ancient and modern, which he supplied either at life-size or reduced. His works in plaster and lead are to be seen in several country houses today.

At All Souls, Oxford, the Codrington Library has twenty-four plaster busts of eminent fellows of the college. They were modelled and cast in the years 1749-1752 by John Cheere, who evidently based them on paintings or engraved portraits. The bust of Wren, for instance, has no resemblance to the famous marble by Edward Pearce in the Ashmolean Museum, but came presumably from an oil portrait or engraving. The busts are placed on the shelves, high above floor level. Originally they were white, but at some point they were painted black with the result that the features now are scarcely recognisable from below. The College had decided on these twenty-four busts: however, they may not have been thought completely successful because, except in one instance, the sculptor is not known to have repeated any of them. John Cheere’s later and more typical works are based on well-known ancient marbles or modern portraits by famous sculptors. .

At the Wren Library, Cambridge, above the shelves there are twenty-four plaster portraits of classical and modern English authors. No documentary evidence has been found to prove Cheere’s authorship, but it seems to have been he who modelled and supplied them, though perhaps he had some outside assistance. The college had made out their list of the authors before 1753, and the busts were in place by 1763. The original sources of the portraits are not always clear; however, most of the ancients are based on well-known classical busts (but no sources are known for Cheere’s Plato and Horace). The modern authors were based on historical busts by different sculptors: Pope, for instance, on a famous bust by Roubiliac, Milton from Rysbrack maybe, and Locke from an engraving by Vertue. All these works, we may assume, were modelled or remodelled, at life-size, by John Cheere. The Shakespeare, Milton and Locke busts are typical instances of the ‘John Cheere’ style of modelling. They are competent portraits, but they have neither the rococo elegance of his brother Sir Henry, nor the baroque gravity of Rysbrack.

In addition to the plaster busts in the Wren Library, at floor level there are fifteen fine marble busts of eminent members of the College. Ten, including Newton and Bacon, are by Roubiliac, four are by Scheemakers, and one (later) bust is by John Bacon.

Four of the Athenæum busts (Shakespeare, Milton, Locke and Newton) and probably two of those missing (Pope and Bacon) were identical to those at Cambridge. It seems that the moulds for plaster casts owned by Cheere were passed down to Sarti, who was able to use them in 1830.

The Athenæum busts represent a wider range of subjects than merely literature. Their scope suggests an analogy with the Temple of British Worthies at Stowe, which contains sixteen historical busts celebrating British achievements in the arts and liberal politics. They were made in stone by Rysbrack and Scheemakers, during the 1730s; six of them are of the same subjects as the Athenæum collection; the others are mostly defenders of British liberties. Rysbrack also supplied sets of historical busts, usually in terracotta, to certain patrons, including Queen Caroline, for Richmond and St James’s Palaces, and Sir Edward Littleton of Teddesley in Staffordshire. Rysbrack often based his models on engravings by George Vertue.

The original sculptors of the Athenæum busts included Roubiliac (Newton), Scheemakers (Harvey), Nollekens (Johnson and Mansfield) and Ceracchi (Reynolds). Apart from the later inclusion of Chantrey’s Scott, the only 19th century ‘Worthy’ was Flaxman, whose portrait was almost certainly a bust by E .H. Baily. By the time the busts were set up they were all ‘historic’, i.e. images of men who were dead; but seven out of the fourteen had been modelled ad vivum, and the seven subjects, then very much alive, had sat for their portraits.

The lost bust of Wren is mysterious. In February 1823, the Committee obtained permission from the Dean and Chapter of St Paul’s for Sarti to take a cast from their bust of the architect. But evidently the Club then somehow obtained an existing plaster bust which they passed to Sarti for repair. There is, moreover, no record of St Paul’s Chapter having owned a portrait bust of Wren, though they now own a plaster cast of the famous bust at Oxford attributed to Edward Pearce.

There are several points of interest in Sarti’s bill (Appendix I). One is the relative cheapness of plaster casts: he supplied them for £1. 10s. each. Evidently he already possessed most of the moulds for making the casts, and we have suggested that he had acquired a collection of them from the studio of John Cheere, which had been finally dismantled in 1812. The two exceptions are the bust of Wren (which is lost), and that of Reynolds for which Sarti’s charge of 3 three guineas included the making of a new mould and adding portions of drapery. Another interesting detail is that the Royal Academy would not allow Sarti to keep the moulds of their Reynolds, from which he would have been able to make further casts.

Collections of Plaster Busts

West Wycombe Park, Buckinghamshire. Four excellent ‘bronzed’ (i.e. black) busts are in the Music Room. Milton and Locke are the same models as those in the Wren Library, and at the Athenaeum. The third is Newton, cast from a marble bust but not the same as at the Athenaeum: it is by Rysbrack, not Roubiliac. The fourth bust is of Dryden (after Scheemakers); the same is in the Wren Library, but it is not at the Athenaeum. The busts are full size, and have name-labels (not inscribed) between socle and bust. Placed in the spacious Music Room, these plaster busts have acquired an almost architectural importance. They are first listed in a house inventory of 1782, and were almost certainly supplied by John Cheere in the 1770s. Their splendid pedestals of inlaid marble, as well as the fine marble doorcases and chimneypieces at the house, are likely to have been made by Sir Henry Cheere, elder brother of John. It is curious that the names of neither John nor Henry Cheere appears in the West Wycombe archives.

Shardeloes, Buckinghamshire. There were full-size library busts, circa 1770, of Shakespeare, Milton, Locke, Newton and Pope. Apparently ‘bronzed’, they were bought in 1959 by the City Museum and Art Gallery, Birmingham, to be shown at Aston Hall. (At present they are in store and not available for inspection.) The socle on Pope is of a type supplied by John Cheere (Baker, Wren Library, fig. 66).

Wimpole Hall, Cambridgeshire. The National Trust owns full-size plaster busts of Locke (white plaster), Milton and Dryden (both ‘bronzed’), and Pope (‘bronzed’, but a different model from that at the Wren Library). All four have the impressed signature ‘P. Sarti Dean Street, Soho’. They may originally have been at Wimpole, but are more likely to have been acquired as a job lot after 1936 by Captain George and Elsie Bambridge, who owned and refurnished the house.

The Garrick Club, London. White plasters of Shakespeare and Garrick were separately given to the Club between 1834 and 1841. Shakespeare is the same as the Athenæum bust; but it bears the stamp of Robert Shout (c1760-1843), and is thought to date from about 1808. Garrick too is the same as the Athenæum’s example, except that three buttons have been removed from his coat.

The Royal Academy, Burlington House, London. . The Ooctagonal Rroom was constructed in 1867-69, and eight plaster busts, placed high up in circular niches, represent the arts. Four are of Italians (Leonardo, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Titian); and four of English artists: Reynolds, after Ceracchi; Wren, after Pearce; Flaxman, after Baily; and and one of unknown identity.

Making Plaster Casts

Casting in plaster was a normal part of the sculptor’s trade. In The London Tradesman (1747, by R. Campbell), the work of casting is described as ‘merely mechanical’. However it was laborious, and required experienced and professional craftsmen.

A cast can be made from a work in almost any material, i.e. of marble, bronze, lead, wood, clay, terracotta, wax , or another plaster,; and the resulting cast may be in plaster, lead, bronze or other metal. The process is not easy fully to understand if one has not practised it. What follows describes the simplest of various processes.


First, some oil is applied to protect the original; then the object is given a very thick covering of talc or plaster, which solidifies and becomes the mould. For a bust with simple contours the mould might be made in two pieces, forming front and back; but if the hair or drapery is complicated,, and for statues, it will be a ‘piece mould’ consisting of a number — sometimes a considerable number - of separate pieces. The limbs of a statue were often cast separately.


he moulds are then bound together, and liquid gesso (plaster of Paris) is poured into the open base or back. Plaster solidifies quite quickly; when it is quite dry, the moulds are removed. The emerging bust or figure, which is hollow, is then ‘repaired’: the limbs are assembled as necessary; defects and cavities are filled and smoothed. The features can be sharpened up with a chisel. Finally, the surface is given a finish such as lime-wash or paint. Two plaster busts by Nollekens at Castle Howard are of a pleasing blue-grey colour. John Cheere invented the process known as ‘bronzing’ with shellac, which gives an attractive black surface.

After about 1770, the normal procedure of a sculptor, whether of busts or figures, would be as follows. After he had modelled his statue or portrait bust in clay full-size, he would make from it a cast in plaster. The plaster cast was his working model; it was this that would be exactly copied in marble. The advantage of plaster over clay or terracotta was that it would not shatter, distort or shrink when drying. The sculptor normally kept the moulds from which further casts could be made; but he could readily make new moulds if and when they were needed, from the model or finished marble.

Rysbrack, in 1758, sent terracotta models of his busts for casting to Peter Vanina, a professional plaster man. For a bust, new moulds cost three guineas, and each plaster cast sixteen shillings. Vanina wrote that ‘the Mould when Made will be good to cast fifteen or twenty Casts out of it’. Dr Johnson wrote that Nollekens, in 1778, would charge one or two guineas for a plaster cast; but (according to J.T. Smith) he sold plaster casts of his bust of Pitt (1806) for six guineas each. In 1806, Nollekens charged Charles Burney junior £30, which covered making the mould of his father’s bust and supplying twelve plaster casts. By comparison with Nollekens, Sarti’s charge of £1 .10s. for each bust seems moderate. However, plaster busts were sold even more cheaply than that to the Crystal Palace in 1853; a number of them ordered from the British Museum could cost as little as 15s. each.

Plaster busts used to be more common than they are now. They are easily damaged; the cheap material, unless covered by an improving paint or wash, can be unattractive, becoming dirty or dusty. Plaster busts came to be disregarded and were often thrown away. But at certain houses, for example Castle Howard and Badminton, there are still good portraits in plaster by Nollekens, and they look very much at home on the library shelves.

The Athenæum Club's Sculpture

A Temple of British Worthies: The Historic Portrait Busts in the Athenæum
A Catalogue of the Plaster Busts at the Athenæum
Other busts the Athenæum
Athena by E. H. Baily
The Belvedere Apollo
Lord Leighton by Thomas Brock
Psyche by Thorvaldsen
The Athenæum Club's Paintings, Drawings, and Graphic Works

Charles Darwin, replica of painting by Sir John Everett Millais
F. T. Palgrave by George James Howard (drawing)
Cardinal Manning by Alphonse Legros (drawing)
The Peacock's Feather by Robert Anning Bell (watercolor)
Self-portrait, replica by William Holman Hunt of the painting in the Uffizi (painting)
G. F. Watts by Alphonse Legros (drawing)
Members of the Athenæum, a caricature by Burne-Jones (drawing)
References

Bradley, Simon, and Nikolaus Pevsner. London 6: Westminster. “The Buildings of England.” New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003.

Hatton, Joseph. Clubland London and Provincial. London: J. S. Vertie, 1890. Internet Archive version of a copy in the University of Toronto Library. Web. 29 February 2012.

Tait, Hugh, and Richard Walker with contributions by Sarah Dodgson, Ian Jenkins, and Ralph Pinder-Wilson. The Athenæum Collection. London: The Athenæum, 2000. [This volume may be ordered from the Librarian, The Athenæum, Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5 ER.]

Η ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΙΑΜΑΤΙΚΩΝ ΛΟΥΤΡΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΜΕΤΕΞΕΛΙΞΗ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΕ SPA

Τα νερά των φυσικών ή ιαματικών πηγών είναι νερά, που πηγάζουν μέσα από πετρώματα και βράχους που βγαίνουν από τα έγκατα της γης. Είναι εμπλ...