MythologyMythologyDocumentariesFestivalspersonswarsBeutiful HellasArtFun

3.9.16

The Battle of Cunaxa and the March of the 10,000, 3 September 401 BC

Wars Of Hellas
Why you see this battle on our site? The reason is the participation of Greek mercenaries, but also because of the involvement of the Persians in greek civil wars, whose participation has held many times the result of wars (see. Peloponnesian).
Around 10 am on the morning of September 3, 401 bc Cyrus the Younger’s army was approaching the Babylonian village of Cunaxa, a tiny settlement not far from the Euphrates River. Cyrus was a prince of Persia’s Achaemenid dynasty, seeking to take over the throne from his older brother Artaxerxes II “The Mindful.” A messenger named Pategyas appeared, his horse well lathered from a hard gallop. Pategyas had a vital piece of intelligence to deliver: Artaxerxes’ army was on its way; the long-awaited battle to decide the ruler of the Persian Empire was now at hand.
Preparations
Cyrus gathered an army of Greek mercenaries, consisting of 10,400 hoplites and 2,500 light infantry, and, peltasts, under the Spartan general Clearchus, and met Artaxerxes at Cunaxa. He also had a large force of levied troops under his second-in-command Ariaeus. The strength of the Achaemenid army was 40,000 men.

When Cyrus learned that his elder brother, the Great King, was approaching with his army, he drew up his army in battle array. He placed the Greek mercenaries on the right, near the river. In addition to this they were supported on their right by some cavalry, 1,000 strong, as was the tradition of battle order in that day. To the Greeks, this was the place of honor. Cyrus himself with 600 body guards was in the center, to the left of the Greek mercenaries - the place where Persian monarchs traditionally placed themselves in the order of battle. Cyrus' Asiatic troops were on the left flank.

Inversely, Artaxerxes II placed his left on the river, with a unit of cavalry supporting it also. Artaxerxes was in the center of his line, with 6,000 units of Persian cavalry (which were some of the finest in the world and by far superior to anything Cyrus or the Greeks could field) which was to the left of Cyrus, his line being so much the longer. Artaxerxes line overlapped Cyrus' line quite significantly, since he was able to field many more troops.

Cyrus then approached Clearchus, the leader of the Greeks, who was commanding the phalanx stationed on the right, and ordered him to move into the center so as to go after Artaxerxes. However, Clearchus, not desiring to do this - for fear of his right flank - refused, and promised Cyrus, according to Xenophon, that he would "take care that all would be well".Cyrus wanted to place him in the center as the Greeks were his most capable unit, and were thereby most able to defeat the elite Persian cavalry and in the process kill the Great King, thereby gaining the Persian throne for Cyrus. Clearchus refused this owing to the insecurity that the Greeks had for their right flank, which tended to drift and was undefended, as the shields were held in the left hand. That Clearuchus did not obey this order is a sign of the level of control that Cyrus had over his army, as a couple of other occasions throughout this campaign prior to the battle reveal also. This is inconsistent with military discipline, even in this day.

Before the final attack began, Xenophon, the main relater of the events at Cunaxa, who was probably at the time some kind of mid-level officer, approached Cyrus to ensure that all the proper orders and dispositions had been made. Cyrus told him that they had, and that the sacrifices that traditionally took place before a battle promised success.

10,000 Highly Trained Hoplites
The prince’s confidence was not entirely the product of youthful arrogance. He was secure in the knowledge he had literally the best troops money could buy. His hopes of ultimate victory rested with his Greek mercenaries, particularly the 10,000 heavily armed hoplites. Sporting bronze helmets, breastplates, and bronze leg greaves, these armored warriors fought in a dense, shoulder-to-shoulder formation called a phalanx. The Greeks also had peltasts, light and mobile troops who carried small shields and javelins. Cyrus was sure nothing could stand against them.

A Spartan named Clearchus was the leader of the Greeks. A blunt, grizzled old soldier of about 50, he drew his men up with the Euphrates guarding their flank. The Greeks formed the right wing of Cyrus’s army; the prince’s left wing was largely native troops under a Persian named Arianeus. The center was held by Cyrus himself, leading a compact body of elite horsemen. Although about 600 men, this cavalry was a bodyguard that made up in fighting prowess what it lacked in numbers.

Artaxerxes’ army appeared in the early afternoon, its coming announced by an enormous white dust cloud that was stirred by the ceaseless tramp of thousands of feet. Occasionally the choking swirls parted to reveal the sun-glinting tips of bronze spearheads. It was a spectacle that chilled the blood even in the torrid afternoon heat.

Cyrus surveyed his army, and when he neared the Hellenes an Athenian named Xenophon approached him for orders. Hearing a murmur ripple through the Greek ranks, Cyrus asked what was being said. “Zeus Soter” and “Nike,” was the quick reply, “Zeus Savior” and “Victory.” Pleased, Cyrus took his position in the center.

When the opposing armies were no more than 600 to 800 yards apart the Greeks began to advance. Each man carried a large hoplon shield on his left arm, while his right brandished an iron-tipped spear. The serried ranks moved with perfect precision, horsehair plumes nodding over burnished bronze helmets in cadence with every step. They seemed an impenetrable wall of flesh and bronze, and as they drew nearer the Persians broke and ran.

Scenting total victory, the Greeks pursued the retreating foe for about an hour. In the meantime Cyrus, seeing his royal brother in the center just opposite him, galloped forward to personally slay the Great King. It was a rash move, something that ultimately cost Cyrus his life. Cyrus’s horsemen clashed with the Great King’s men, and in the ensuing melee Artaxerxes was wounded.

As he pressed forward Cyrus received a javelin wound under the eye, but before he could recover, enemy soldiers were swarming over him. The prince was hacked to pieces, his head and right hand cut off for display. Cyrus’s left wing under Arianeus was routed, the panicked soldiers abandoning the prince’s camp in a frantic effort to escape.

A Battlefield Littered with 15,000 Corpses
The Greeks were unaware that their royal paymaster was dead. They were seemingly victorious over Artaxerxes’ left wing, but all was rendered moot by the prince’s sudden demise. The Hellenes found out the next day when a messenger from Arianeus brought the news. The day grew hot, and though the troops could quench their thirst in the Euphrates, food was scarce. Oxen and asses from the baggage train provided meat on the hoof, and were quickly slaughtered for rations. Greeks also foraged the battlefield, which was littered with the corpses of some 15,000 men festering in the heat. The gagging stench must have been indescribable, but tough Hellenes picked their way though the bodies to retrieve shields and arrows for fuel.

Heralds from the Great King appeared, asking if the Greeks wanted to continue the war. If not, they should lay down their arms and surrender. Clearchus gave the heralds an ambiguous reply to keep the Persians guessing, then the Greeks marched from Cunaxa to join Arianeus. Once the linkup was accomplished, Arianeus suggested they march north, since retracing their steps was out of the question. The country behind was picked clean, and they would soon starve. A shaky truce with Arta- xerxes was also arranged through the offices of a satrap (governor) named Tissaphernes.

After the Battle of Cunaxam 10,000 Hoplites began a harsh and punishing march against the odds.

Tissaphernes had commanded the Persian left that had so embarrassingly fled at the Greek’s approach, yet he still seemed to hold the king’s favor. The satrap personally appeared, pledging to lead them safely to Ionia (Greek Asia Minor) if only they would in turn promise not to pillage or harm any inhabitants along the way. All parties swore the appropriate solemn oaths, then Tissaphernes left, not to reappear for 20 days. Around 300 Greeks had already gone over to Artaxerxes, decamping when the Hellene cause seemed hopeless. Arianeus and his men also deserted the Greeks, swayed by the Great King’s honeyed promises of amnesty and reconciliation.

The Greeks resumed their march, fascinated by the new sights they encountered, even as they kept a wary eye out for Persian treachery, for they did not entirely trust Tissaphernes and his like. The Great Wall of Media, a rampart of bituminous sun-dried brick 20 feet thick and 100 feet high that stretched for miles, excited much comment. They then encountered two canals filled with water from the Tigris River. These arteries of life-giving liquid fed smaller irrigation ditches, transforming an arid plain into a fertile soil covered with wheat and other crops.

The Persian forces shadowed the Greeks, and even if they were periodically absent from view, their unseen presence was keenly felt by the weary mercenaries. The Greeks reached the Tigris, camping near a prosperous river town called Sittace. Lush green trees flourished amid scenes of natural beauty; the mercenaries must have thought they were in a terrestrial paradise like the fabled Hanging Gardens of Babylon.

The Hellenes crossed the Tigris via a bridge of boats, then proceeded north. Another 60-mile trek brought them near a city called Opis. A large Persian army was there, commanded by a bastard brother of Artaxerxes and Cyrus. Ever the fox, Clearchus formed his men in a column only two abreast. The long, snaking line of hoplites seemed two or three times their actual number. The Persians, feeling discretion is the better part of valor, let the Greeks move on without incident.

After four more days the footsore Hellenes reached the vicinity of Caenae, a city on the opposite bank of the Tigris. The natives were cooperative, ferrying over bread, cheese, and wine to the famished travelers. The River Zapatas (today’s Greater Zab in Iraq), a smaller stream that emptied into the Tigris, was nearby.

The Persians had made no hostile move since Cunaxa weeks earlier; yet the very absence of hostilities made a clash seem certain, even inevitable. But when would Tissaphernes make his move? Double-dealing and treachery were his stock in trade—would he really let the Greeks depart unmolested, and thus expose the empire’s weakness and apparent inability to resist outsiders?

Four of the Five Were Beheaded on the Spot
Clearchus wanted to end the anxiety by having a face-to-face talk with the wily satrap. A truce talk was arranged, Tissaphernes being very agreeable to the idea. When the proposed meeting was discussed many Greeks were against the plan, for obvious reasons. In the end, Clearchus’s stubbornness won the day. The Greek truce-talk party included the tough old Spartan and four other Hellenic strategoi: Proxenus the Boeotian, Menon the Thessalian, Agias the Arcadian, and Socrates the Achaean.

About 20 captains and 200 soldiers accompanied them, the latter less a bodyguard than a group of hungry men seeking additional provisions. When they arrived in the Persian camp Tissaphernes was all smiles, cordially welcoming the generals into his tent. At the signal the strategoi were seized and the rest of their entourage put to the sword. The five captive Greek generals were dragged before Artaxerxes so the king could witness their summary execution. Four of the five were beheaded on the spot; a fifth general, also named Menon, was spared for torture and abuse. He had an unsavory reputation, so he was a special target for Persian ire. Xenophon relates he was finally killed about a year later.

A soldier named Nicharus staggered into the Greek camp, the sole survivor of the truce-talk party. A Persian sword had slashed open his abdomen, a cut so deep his bluish intestines were held in place by his own gore-soaked hands. Through blood-flecked lips the mortally wounded man told of his companions’ fate. It was obvious that Tissaphernes had dealt the Greeks a grievous blow. With their leadership gone the Hellenes might dissolve into a rabble intent only on self-preservation.

That evening the Greeks shivered in their cloaks, so depressed that few kindled campfires and fewer still bothered to eat. What were these 10,000 Europeans doing here in the heart of Asia? What were they doing a thousand miles from their Mediterranean home? Once Greek hoplites had been motivated by loyalty to their native city-state, but at least for some, profit had replaced patriotism. By 401 bc the Greeks were becoming less parochial, more cosmopolitan. Still, many of the mercenaries must have cursed the sense of adventure and lust for wealth that had brought them here. It looked like the road to an early grave.

Survival Seemed Questionable for Xenophon
Xenophon had more to regret than most. He had come along at the urging of his now-dead friend General Proxenus, even though he wasn’t a soldier and had little use for military glory. Athens had been devastated by the Peloponnesian War; half its citizen body was dead, its once-flourishing commercial empire in ruins. It certainly didn’t seem the place to be for an ambitious man, someone who wanted to make his mark in the world. Xenophon’s dreams of success faded with Cyrus’s death at Cunaxa; now even bare survival seemed questionable.

The Athenian tossed and turned in his himation cloak that he used as a blanket. Sleep was tardy, but when he did drop off he had a dream that was later interpreted as a good omen from Zeus, the father of the gods. Awakening, he hastened to describe his dream to the captains of Proxenus’s old command. Encouraged, the captains told him to repeat the tale to the surviving officers of the entire Greek army.

When all were assembled Xenophon gave the speech of his life. Instead of wallowing in self-pity, the Athenian told the officers to rise to the occasion. They should be role models for their men, inspiring the troops with their courage and resolve. If the Greeks allowed themselves to despair, the Persians had already won. Xenophon suggested that new generals be elected to replace those so treacherously murdered. The proposal was adopted, but Xenophon found himself one of five new strategoi elected to lead the men.

A council of war was convened to discuss the situation. Xenophon put on his best clothes for the occasion, feeling that such raiment would be a talisman of victory. “We have fair hopes of deliverance,” he exclaimed, and as he pronounced the word soterias, “deliverance,” a man sneezed. In the Greek world such an occurrence was not accidental, but a good omen, a message from Zeus Soter. The men instinctively began to worship in the deepest gratitude. Religion was the glue that bound this disparate mercenary force together. These were Greeks from all over the Mediterranean, and some were even lately bitter enemies in the Peloponnesian War.

After the Battle of Cunaxam 10,000 Hoplites began a harsh and punishing march against the odds.

But Zeus would only help those mortals who help themselves. It was now time to adopt a plan of action. Xenophon felt they should march north; the route might be long, and fraught with danger, but the country ahead gave fair promise of abundance. And if the Tigris barred their way west and the way home, they would march toward its headwaters, “For all rivers, even though they be impassible at a distance from their sources, become passable, without even wetting your knees, as you approach the sources.”

Xenophon also suggested all unnecessary baggage be discarded, including tents and wagons. Such civilized comforts would only impede the march. The hoplites would form a hollow square, in that way protecting the baggage animals and the numerous camp followers the Greeks had acquired along the way. The Greeks had no cavalry, but Xenophon insisted it was no handicap. On the contrary, as infantry the Greeks “have a surer foundation than your horsemen; they are hanging on horses’ backs afraid not only of us, but of falling off.”

In an even more jocular mood Xenophon reminded his listeners that “nobody ever lost his life in battle from the kick or bite of a horse.” This wry observation, which must have raised a laugh from his audience, was to haunt Xenophon the very next day.

200 Cavalry and 400 Archers Attacked Fiercely
A Spartan named Cheirisophus was placed in command of the vanguard, Xenophon the rear guard. The march began shortly after breakfast, the army adopting the hollow-square formation Xenophon had suggested the previous night during council. In essence the camp followers and baggage animals were protected by a four-sided “wall” of hoplite infantry.

A Persian commander named Mithradates appeared with 200 cavalry and 400 archers and slingers and launched an immediate attack. It was clear the Persians were bent on nothing less than the complete annihilation of the Greeks. Those initially spared might be tortured to death, mutilated, or simply sold into slavery. It was a grim prospect no matter how one looked at it; even Socrates, Xenophon’s old teacher in Athens (and not the murdered general), would not have been able to derive much comfort from the perilous situation the Greeks found themselves in.

Hoplites lifted their hoplons (shields) to full port in anticipation of the missile barrage to come. They were not disappointed. Stone sling bullets drummed on upturned hoplons in a murderous, noisy tattoo and arrows shattered against their bronze-faced hardness. Persian cavalry galloped forward, the riders wearing brown and white tunics and their distinctive tiara headdress. This multicolored avalanche of men and horseflesh was designed for missile offense, not shock action. Each man would hurl one or two javelins into the Greeks before retreating on swift mounts.

Xenophon’s rear guard suffered the most, being unable to mount an adequate defense. There were Cretan bowmen with Xenophon, but their bows lacked the range of Persian weapons, and they were without protective armor. Worse still, they were marching inside the hoplite square, cheek by jowl with the milling baggage animals and frightened noncombatants. Trying to aim at an unseen enemy from a chaotic crowd of braying asses and panicked civilians proved too great a task.

Incapable of standing the punishment a moment longer, the Greek rear guard pursued their tormentors. Hoplites went forward at the run, though naturally enough their heavy armor was an impediment. Their bronze helmets provided for little ventilation, and soon the searing heat of the sun and their own exertions caused cascades of sweat upon their faces.

The Persian bowmen and slingers were so far away they had a good head start on their pursuers and easily evaded them. The cavalry were mounted on swift horses, and they had the discomforting skill of being able to turn around and shoot to the rear as they retreated. Try as they might, the exhausted Greeks were unable to close with such an elusive foe.

Fighting “Fire with Fire”
That night a somewhat chastened Xenophon came in for a good deal of criticism, though there were recriminations all around. Xenophon admitted he had been rash in ordering a fruitless rear-guard pursuit, but on reflection realized a solution was within reach. The Greeks had no cavalry, and although he once scorned the mounted arm, the day’s painful experience had taught him the error of his ways. The Athenian proposed forming a kind of flying squadron of cavalry that would deal with Persian horsemen on something like their own terms. Some of the Greeks knew how to ride, and there were still a few horses with the baggage train and about the camp. The plan was adopted, and Lygius the Athenian was placed at the head of 50 Greek horsemen.
But the problem of the Persian slingers remained. Here again, Xenophon felt the Greeks had the means to fight “fire with fire.” There were a number of Greeks present who hailed from the island of Rhodes, men known throughout the ancient world for their skill with the sling. They could cast missiles farther than the Persians, and—when circumstances permitted—prefered to use lead “bullets” instead of stone. Before long a 200-man corps of Rhodian slingers was organized. Later, lead was found in some villages that provided the Rhodians with their favorite ammunition.

Xenophon’s ideas soon proved their worth. Encouraged by the success of the previous day, Mithradates promised his superior Tissaphernes that the Greeks would soon be delivered into his hands. The Persian force that attacked was much larger, 1,000 cavalry and 4,000 archers. The Hellenes soon sprung their surprise on the unsuspecting Persians, Polystratus and his horsemen riding down the startled enemy before they even knew what hit them. The Persian cavalry faired no better, and 18 of them were captured. The Greeks mutilated the Persian corpses, disfiguring them in hope of demoralizing the enemy.

After the Battle of Cunaxam 10,000 Hoplites began a harsh and punishing march against the odds.

There was little time for rejoicing; they might overcome the Persians, but they had yet to conquer distance. The Greek odyssey continued, the fear of battle replaced by the mind-numbing tedium of endless marching. Sweat soaked through chiton tunics; faces became grimy, dust-caked masks; and throats grew parched with thirst.

The trek took them past the ruins of a great city that Xenophon called “Mespila.” This was in fact the remains of Nineveh, once capital of the great Assyrian empire. Its crumbling battlements, now inhabited by scurrying lizards, elicited little interest from the fatigued travelers. Philosophy was a Greek passion, but exhausted minds had little time to ruminate on the fall of empires; self-preservation was the immediate concern.

The countryside began to change, and at times the road snaked through narrow ridges and rolling hills. The hollow-square formation was found wanting—when the road narrowed, the hoplites bunched together and lost all cohesion, and when it finally widened it took time to sort things out and regain original ranks.

Enough Wounded To Require Eight Surgeons
To solve the problem, a flexible hollow-square formation was adopted, necessity truly being the mother of invention. Six companies of a hundred men were formed; three companies marched in the middle of the front of the square, three in the rear. When the road narrowed, the six companies would drop back in order, allowing the square to contract without difficulty. When the road widened again, they would plug the gaps that were created and complete the square. This expanding and contracting “accordion” formation helped combat efficiency.

The Greeks now came upon a series of low hills whose natural undulations ended at a mountain in the distance. When the Hellenes ascended the first hill there was no opposition, but when they clambered down, Persians from a second hill pelted them with arrows and sling bullets. When the hoplites tried to climb the second hill, their assailants were gone before they could reach its crest. Even the nimblest Greek was helpless when encumbered by helmets and heavy hoplon shields. Greek peltasts were dispatched to climb the mountain slopes and outflank the Persians in the hills. The maneuver proved a success.

For a time one Greek division marched up and down the range of hills while another division of peltasts guarded their flanks by adopting a parallel course along the mountain slopes. These operations, while successful, were not without cost. There were so many wounded, eight surgeons were appointed to care for them.

The Greeks finally reached the headwaters of the Tigris, but found to their dismay the swift, bone-chilling waters were too deep to cross. A Rhodian came forward and announced he knew how to get across the river—for a price. He suggested a line of inflated animal skin floats fastened together like buoys, the ends firmly anchored on each bank with stones. There were plenty of goats, sheep, cattle, and asses to provide the skins, and the Rhodian insisted that once sewn and inflated each float could support the weight of two men.

The Greek leaders agreed the plan had merit; mercenaries themselves, they didn’t seem to mind the Rhodian’s “profit motive.” In the end, the plan was rejected because horsemen could be seen on the opposite bank. The Greeks would be hard put to establish the bridge of floats, much less cross by them. It was decided they would keep to this side of the river at present, continuing north into the country of the Carduchians (today’s Kurdistan). Fiercely independent, the Carduchians were a tough and savage people who had never been fully incorporated into the Persian Empire.

But just because they didn’t like the Persians didn’t mean they would ally themselves with the Greeks. On the contrary, the Carduchians would fight any outsider foolish enough to “invade” the mountain fastness of their rugged domain. But if the Greeks could successfully cross Carduchian territory, they would find themselves in Armenia, where the going would hopefully be easier. The ultimate goal would be the Euxinus (Black Sea), where a number of Greek cities managed to maintain a fragile toehold of Hellenic civilization. Once they arrived in those Greek cities they would be “home,” able to book passage on ships returning to mainland Greece or Ionia.

Xenophon’s Fighting Retreat
The march resumed, and the Greeks came upon some abandoned Carduchian villages that provided much-needed supplies. The famished soldiers took only what was absolutely necessary, purposely refraining from looting to gain the natives’ good will. But any hope of peaceful accommodation was dashed when the Carduchians fell on the rear guard, killing and wounding many.

During the melee, slate-gray clouds produced a heavy storm, a strong, slashing downpour whipped to a frenzy by gusting winds. As usual Cheirisophus commanded the van, Xenophon the rear. The rear seemed to get the worst of it, and Xenophon became so heavily engaged he sent messages to Cheirisophus asking him to halt and wait for the rear to catch up. The Spartan usually complied, but in one instance he ignored the plea and moved forward rapidly. A large gap now separated the van and the rear guard, and there was a distinct possibility that Xenophon would be cut off and annihilated.

Xenophon’s men conducted a fighting retreat and managed to link up with the van. The rear had taken casualties, including Leonymus the Laconian, killed by an arrow that somehow went through his shield and breastplate; and Basias the Arcadian, shot through the head. Xenophon sought out Cheirisophus at once, bitterly reproaching him for abandoning his comrades in the rear guard to their fate.

“Take a look at the mountains,” was Cheirisophus’s reply, “and observe how impassable all of them are. The only road is the one there … and on that you can see the great crowd of people [Carduchians] who have taken possession of it and are guarding our way out.” The Spartan continued, “That’s the reason why I would not wait for you, for I hoped to reach the pass and occupy it before they did.” Obviously the race had been lost, and they were trapped.

Or were they? Xenophon had two Carduchian prisoners taken for just such an emergency. They were brought forward and interrogated, but one of them stubbornly refused to talk. The enraged Greeks killed him on the spot, which quickly loosened the tongue of the other prisoner. Yes, the Carduchian captive admitted, there was another trail across the mountains, and he would show the way. The prisoner proved as good as his word, and after many hardships the Greeks successfully evaded the trap and pushed forward.

Nowhere to Retreat, No Way to Move Forward…
The bone-weary Hellenes reached the Centrites River (the eastern Tigris), a broad band of water stretching 200 feet across what was the boundary between the land of the Carduchians and Armenia. But before they could cross they saw masses of Armenian, Mardian, and Chaldaean mercenaries drawn up along the far bank. These were the troops of the Persian satrap Orontas, obviously sent to bar their way. The river itself was icy cold and very swift, and the Greeks realized they would have to wade the waters with hoplon shields high above their heads to protect against missile fire, an almost impossible task.

After the Battle of Cunaxam 10,000 Hoplites began a harsh and punishing march against the odds.

The Greeks saw great masses of Carduchian warriors clustered in the mountain slopes to their rear, just waiting for the right moment to pounce. They could not go forward, and they could not retreat; the game seemed up at last. The weary Hellenes camped for the night, many wondering what the morrow would bring. Xenpohon had another dream—or so he says—that promised salvation. In his dream the Athenian was securely bound in chains, but suddenly the fetters dropped off. Upon awakening he hastened to tell Cheirisophus, who was heartened by the tale.

Xenophon was eating breakfast when two youths came up to him with exciting news: they had stumbled upon a practicable ford. Immediately there was a libation—a ritual pouring of wine from a cup—to the god who had shown a path to freedom. The Greek army forded the river and continued the march. The territory was more level here, and they came across a palace surrounded by some villages. This palace-villa obviously belonged to an enemy potentate, so the Greeks had no qualms about sacking it from top to bottom.

Snow was falling, but the Greeks found good shelter in the villages that surrounded the ransacked villa. There were supplies in great abundance; and the men gorged themselves on dried grapes and beans, washing it down with “old wines with a fine bouquet.” It would have been nice to linger for a while, but during the night some of the Greeks saw the gleam of many campfires in the distance. Tiribazus, a Persian official under the satrap Orontas, was at their heels, forcing them to move on.

It was now late November, and heavy snows began to fall in earnest. The march resumed, taking on the qualities of Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow 2,200 years later. A bitter north wind blew directly into their faces, chilling the Greeks as they plodded through the snow-drifts.

The days passed, and if the winds abated, the suffering did not. Snowdrifts reached heights of six feet, and men and animals began to perish from exposure. Even old soldiers were finding it tough going, because they were unprepared for cold weather. Much of the campaign had been on the sun-baked plains of Mesopotamia, and the Greeks had dressed accordingly. Flimsy wool tunics were inadequate, and even heavy military cloaks did little to keep out the freezing cold.

The Greeks struggled on, breath misting in great clouds of smokey vapor as they trudged through the snowdrifts. Sandals and boots left feet exposed to the elements, and many lost toes to frostbite. A great many soldiers had worn out their sandals long before, substituting freshly flayed oxhide brogans as replacement footwear. Men who kept these on overnight found that the oxhide froze on their feet, the straps biting deeply into the flesh.

Hopelessness So Severe—Some Men Lost Their Instinct for Self Preservation
The whole area was blanketed in snow, a stark whiteness so all-encompassing many Greeks succumbed to snow blindness. Rations grew so short there was barely enough to keep body and soul together. The men began to suffer from what Xenophon calls bullimia (hunger-faintness).
Xenophon had his hands full trying to keep up his men’s spirits in the face of such extreme conditions. One group of stragglers refused to leave a hot spring they happened upon, even when Xenophon warned them the enemy was close. These men had lost all hope; even the instinct for self-preservation was gone. They begged Xenophon to kill them; even death was preferable to the abject misery of the march. He refused, and later sent able-bodied men back to retrieve them.
The Greeks reached some Armenian villages that provided welcome food and shelter. More mountains blocked their way, but somehow they managed to cross these natural obstacles. They entered the country of the Taochians, a people who were generally hostile to all travelers. Several Taochian strongholds had to be stormed before the Greeks could get desperately needed supplies.

At length they arrived at a city called Gymnias. The local ruler was friendly and provided a guide for the next stage of the journey. Ragged, hollow-eyed men took heart when they realized the Black Sea was only five days from Gymnias. The epic trek was drawing to a close.
Xenophon was with the rear guard when he heard a distant shout from the head of the column. Others took up the cry, and soon thousands of voices melded together in a single exultant roar. The men were also hitting spears against their hoplons, the clatter sounding like a desperately fought battle to those in the rear. Xenophon mounted a horse to see what was the problem, hoping for the best but expecting the worst.

8,000 of the Original Force of 10,000 Remained
The men were crying Thalassa! Thalassa!, “The Sea! The Sea!” Xenophon drew rein on the top of a mountain where the soldiers were clustered; it was a place that afforded a bird’s eye view of the surrounding countryside. There, clearly framed against the mountain peaks, were the waters of the Black Sea. They were saved; once they reached the Greek colony of Trapezus (now Trabzon) they could find ships to go home.

It was late January, 400 bc. Altogether the trek had taken about five months; perhaps 8,000 Greeks remained of the original force of over 10,000. The Hellenes built a stone cairn memorial on the spot where they first saw the sea. In 1997 British scholar Timothy Mitford announced he found the stone cairn still intact after so many centuries. It is located at Deveboynu Tepe, 30 miles south of today’s Trabzon. There is a magnificent view of the distant sea, which seems to clinch the discovery.

Xenophon (431-350 bc) succeeded in his return to Greece. Still a young man, he wrote of his experiences in Anabasis (“upcountry march”), sometimes also known as Anabasis Kyrou (“upcountry march of Cyrus”), one of the great adventure tales of all time. The work resonates to this day and has many lessons to teach about fortitude and improvisation. The volume brought Xenophon considerable fame and money. He then soldiered in Greece for Sparta (earning temporary exile from Athens) and wrote books on horsemanship and cavalry. He also penned memoirs of his studies with Socrates, highly valued along with Plato’s works in giving a portrait of the renowned philosopher.

These literary efforts all had their impacts, in Xenophon’s own time and through the centuries. But one effect of Anabasis was profound on world and military history: The adventure story revealed weaknesses of the Persian Empire that Alexander the Great was quick to exploit some 70 years after the events it described had taken place.

Aftermath
According to the Greek soldier and writer Xenophon, the Greek heavy troops scattered their opposition twice; only one Greek was even wounded. Only after the battle did they hear that Cyrus himself had been killed, making their victory irrelevant and the expedition a failure. They were in the middle of a very large empire with no food, no employer, and no reliable friends. They offered to make their Persian ally Ariaeus king, but he refused on the grounds that he was not of royal blood and so would not find enough support among the Persians to succeed. They offered their services to Tissaphernes, a leading satrap of Artaxerxes, but he refused them, and they refused to surrender to him. Tissaphernes was left with a problem; a large army of heavy troops, which he could not defeat by frontal assault. He supplied them with food and, after a long wait, led them northwards for home, meanwhile detaching Ariaeus and his light troops from their cause.

The Greek senior officers foolishly accepted the invitation of Tissaphernes to a feast. There they were made prisoner, taken up to the king and there decapitated. The Greeks elected new officers and set out to march northwards to the Black Sea through Corduene and Armenia. Their eventual success, the march of the Ten Thousand, was recorded by Xenophon in his Anabasis.

Μάχη στα Κούναξα και Κάθοδος των Μυρίων 3 Σεπ 401 π.Χ.

Μάχες των Ελλήνων
Γιατί βλέπετε αυτήν την μάχη στην σελίδα μας; Λόγω της συμμετοχής των Ελλήνων μισθοφόρων,αλλά και λόγω της εμπλοκής των Περσών στους εμφύλιους πολέμους, η συμμετοχή των οποίων έκρινε πολλές φορές το αποτέλεσμα των πόλεμων (βλ. Πελοποννησιακους ).
Κούναξα είναι πόλη της αρχαίας Βαβυλωνίας σε απόσταση 500 σταδίων από τη Βαβυλώνα. Είναι γνωστή στην Ιστορία για τη μάχη που έγινε εκεί το 401 π.Χ.
Ο σατράπης της Ιωνίας Κύρος ο νεότερος θέλησε να κατακτήσει το θρόνο του αδελφού του Αρταξέρξη, που ήταν βασιλιάς της Περσίας. Έτσι συγκέντρωσε στρατό από 100.000 άντρες και εκστράτευσε από τη Λυδία, τάχα με σκοπό να τιμωρήσει τους κατοίκους της Πισιδίας που είχαν επαναστατήσει. Στο στρατό του είχαν προσχωρήσει 12.000 Έλληνες μισθοφόροι με αρχηγό το Σπαρτιάτη Κλέαρχο. Ο Αρταξέρξης, όταν έμαθε τις ενέργειες του αδελφού του, συγκέντρωσε στρατό από 100.000 άντρες. - Οι δύο στρατοί συναντήθηκαν στα Κούναξα, όπου έγινε σκληρή μάχη. Οι Έλληνες μισθοφόροι νίκησαν κι έτρεψαν σε φυγή τους Πέρσες, αλλά ο Κύρος σκοτώθηκε κι ο στρατός του αναγκάστηκε να συνθηκολογήσει. Οι Έλληνες, με αρχηγό τον Ξενοφώντα, επέστρεψαν στην Ελλάδα μετά από κοπιαστική πορεία διαμέσου της Μ. Ασίας. Ο Ξενοφώντας έγραψε για τις περιπέτειες της επιστροφής αυτής στο έργο του "Κύρου Ανάβασις".

Αλλά ας δουμε την μάχη διεξοδικά. Το 404 πέθανε ο βασιλιάς της Περσίας Δαρείος Β΄. Η σύζυγός του Παρύσατις, που ήταν γυναίκα ικανότατη και ραδιούργα, δεν αγαπούσε τον πρωτότοκο γιο της τον Αρταξέρξη, αλλά το νεώτερο τον Κύρο, που τον είδαμε να διορίζεται στα τελευταία χρόνια του πελοποννησιακού πολέμου ηγεμόνας στις δυτικές παραλίες της Μικράς Ασίας και να συντελεί με την πιστή του συμμαχία προς τους Σπαρτιάτες στον οριστικό τους θρίαμβο.

Οι λόγοι της μάχης και η κατάσταση που επικρατούσε
Το 404 π.Χ. πέθανε ο Αχαιμενίδης βασιλιάς, Δαρείος Β' και τον διαδέχθηκε ο γιος του, Αρταξέρξης Β' προς απογοήτευση του δεύτερου γιου του, Κύρου του Νεότερου γεγονός που οδήγησε σε άγριο ανταγωνισμό και σε μία αναμέτρηση στα Κούναξα, κοντά στη Βαβυλώνα, το 401 π.Χ..

Ο Αρταξέρξης ήταν ο πρώτος εκ των τεσσάρων παιδιών του Δαρείου και της Παρυσάτιδος, γνωστός και ως Αρσάκης. Η Παρυσάτιδα ευνοούσε τον αδερφό του Κύρο, λόγω ότι γεννήθηκε πρώτος, αφού ο Δαρείος είχε γίνει βασιλιάς ενώ ο Αρταξέρξης είχε γεννηθεί πρώτος όταν ο Δαρείος ήταν ακόμη πρίγκηπας. Κατά τη διάρκεια της στέψης του Αρταξέρξη, ο Κύρος συνελήφθη για απόπειρα δολοφονίας κατά του αδερφού του και καταδικάστηκε σε θάνατο. Μετά τη μεσολάβηση της μητέρας του αφέθηκε ελεύθερος και επέστρεψε στις Σάρδεις, με σκοπό να καταστρώσει νέα συνωμοσία κατά του Αρταξέρξη. Κατά τη διάρκεια του Πελοποννησιακού πολέμου ο Κύρος βοήθησε τους Σπαρτιάτες να νικήσουν τους Αθηναίους και αυτοί ανταποδίδοντας τη χάρη απέστειλαν μία μεγάλη δύναμη 10.400 μισθοφόρων.

Ο Κύρος θέλοντας να κρατήσει μυστικές τις προθέσεις του, συνέχισε να πληρώνει τους φόρους του και δικαιολόγησε την συγκέντρωση των ελληνικών δυνάμεων λέγοντας ότι είχε διαμάχη με τον σατράπη της Ιωνίας, Τισσαφέρνη. Οι Έλληνες στρατιώτες, υπό τις διαταγές του Σπαρτιάτη στρατηγού Κλέαρχου συγκεντρώθηκαν χωρίς να γνωρίζουν το λόγο της εκστρατείας και ακόμη και όταν τον έμαθαν, ο Κύρος κατάφερε να τους πείσει με την υπόσχεση περισσοτέρων χρημάτων.
Ο Αρταξέρξης είχε ενημερωθεί για τα πλάνα του Κύρου από τον Τισσαφέρνη. Καταστρώνοντας τα σχέδια του είχε ως βοήθεια τον Έλληνα εμπειρογνώμονα Φαλίνο, ο οποίος - σύμφωνα με τον Ξενοφώντα - εργάζονταν για τον Τισσαφέρνη και θεωρείτο γνώστης των τακτικών του πεζικού.

Οι αντιμαχόμενες δυνάμεις
Οι δύο δυνάμεις διέφεραν κατά πολύ και είχαν διαφορετικά πλεονεκτήματα ο ένας συγκρινόμενος του άλλου. Ο Κύρος είχε ως πλεονέκτημα την ποιότητα του στρατεύματος του, καθώς διέθετε 10.400 βαριά οπλισμένους Έλληνες οπλίτες, αποδεδειγμένα ανώτερους από τους Πέρσες ομόλογους τους. Επίσης, διέθετε 2.500 μισθοφόρους πελταστές, 1.000 Παφλαγόνες ιππείς, 100.000 Ασιατικά στρατεύματα και 600 επίλεκτους ιππείς ως σωματοφυλακή.

Αντ' αυτού, ο Αρταξέρξης είχε ποσοτικό πλεονέκτημα καθώς διέθετε 400.000 πεζικάριους και 150 με 200 δρεπανηφόρα άρματα, καθώς και 6.000 ιππείς ως σωματοφυλακή. Επίσης, ο Αρταξέρξης είχε το πλεονέκτημα ότι περίμενε τον Κύρο και προετοίμασε τον στρατό του όσο το δυνατόν καλύτερα, ενώ ο Κύρος εξασθένισε το στρατό του μέσω μιας μεγάλης πορείας μέσα από την αραβική έρημο.

Η παράταξη των δύο στρατευμάτων
Ο Κύρος περίμενε ότι η αρχική συνάντηση θα πραγματοποιούνταν στην τάφρο που είχε διανοίξει ο Αρταξέρξης αλλά εξεπλάγη όταν πλησιάζοντας προς το όρυγμα συνειδητοποίησε ότι δεν υπήρχε κανείς. Η παράταξη του Κύρου, συνέχισε την προέλαση της με τους Έλληνες μισθοφόρους, υπό την καθοδήγηση του Κλέαρχου, στην δεξιά πλευρά με τον ποταμό Ευφράτη να προστατεύει τα δεξιά τους. Στο αριστερό άκρο της ελληνικής πτέρυγας τοποθετήθηκαν 2.500 πελταστές με 1.000 Παφλαγόνες ελαφρούς ιππείς από πίσω τους. Στο κέντρο του στρατεύματος του, βρισκόταν ο Κύρος με τους 600 βαριά οπλισμένους φρουρούς του. Στο αριστερό άκρο της παράταξης βρισκόταν οι 100.000 Ασιάτες στρατιώτες με 20 δραπανηφόρα άρματα υπό την καθοδήγηση του Πέρση διοικητή Αριαίου.
Ο στρατός του Κύρου προχωρούσε σε σχηματισμό πορείας, όταν γύρω στο μεσημέρι οι ανιχνευτές του ανέφεραν την προσέγγιση του βασιλικού στρατού. Ο στρατός του Αρταξέρξη βρισκόταν σε βαθύ σχηματισμό με τον Αρταξέρξη στο κέντρο. Κοντά στον Ευφράτη είχε τοποθετηθεί το ιππικό του Τισσαφέρνη. Στα δεξιά του ιππικού τάχθηκε το βαρύ περσικό πεζικό και στα αριστερά του το αιγυπτιακό βαρύ πεζικό, ενώ πίσω τους βρισκόταν ιππικό και τοξότες σε μεγάλο βάθος.
Ο Ξενοφών αναφέρει ότι ο Κύρος διέταξε τον Κλέαρχο να παραταχθεί στο κέντρο, απέναντι από τον Αρταξέρξη αλλά ο Σπαρτιάτης στρατηγός αρνήθηκε φοβούμενος περικύκλωση από τον πολυάριθμο στρατό του Πέρση βασιλιά. Επίσης, αναφέρει ότι η μάχη ξεκίνησε νωρίς το απόγευμα οπότε οι δύο δυνάμεις είχαν πολύ χρόνο για να ανασυνταχθούν.

Νίκη Ελλήνων αλλά τελική ήττα του Κύρου
Οι δύο δυνάμεις βρίσκονταν σε απόσταση περίπου μισού χιλιομέτρου, όταν ο Κύρος έδωσε το σύνθημα για επίθεση. Η ελληνική πλευρά του στρατεύματος του προχωρούσε τραγουδώντας τον πολεμικό παιάνα που έδινε συντονισμό στο βάδισμα και ταυτόχρονα αποσκοπούσε στον εκφοβισμό του αντιπάλου. Από την πλευρά του Αρταξέρξη, πρώτα επιτέθηκαν τα δραπανηφόρα άρματα. Σύμφωνα με τον Ξενοφώντα, μερικά από τα εν λόγω άρματα διαπέρασαν κατά λάθος το δικό τους στράτευμα ενώ άλλα πέρασαν τις γραμμές του Κύρου, ακυβέρνητα, με αποτέλεσμα να μην καταφέρουν να διασπάσουν την ελληνική φάλαγγα.

Μέτα τα δραπανηφόρα άρματα, ήταν παραταγμένο το περσικό και αιγυπτιακό ιππικό το οποίο υποχώρησε άτακτα, με τους Έλληνες να τους ακολουθούν για μία περίπου ώρα, κρατώντας τον σχηματισμό τους. Την ίδια στιγμή, η αριστερή πλευρά του Κύρου υπερφαλαγγίστηκε από τη δεξιά του Αρταξέρξη. Ο Τισσαφέρνης, βλέποντας το κενό στην δεξιά πλευρά του Κύρου, αφού οι Σπαρτιάτες είχαν προχωρήσει σχεδόν 6 χιλιόμετρα έχοντας απομακρυνθεί από την υπόλοιπη γραμμή, κατευθύνθηκε προς το ελληνικό στρατόπεδο διασκορπίζοντας τους Παφλαγόνες ιππείς και χωρίς να προσπαθήσει να επιτεθεί στους Έλληνες οπλίτες άδραξε την ευκαιρία, να επιτεθεί από πλάγια, στον Κύρο.
Ο Κύρος βλέποντας ότι δεν είχε επιλογές μετά την απομάκρυνση των Σπαρτιατών, επιτίθεται με τη φρουρά του κατά του αδελφού του. Η φρουρά του Αρταξέρξη διαλύεται σχεδόν αμέσως αφού ο διοικητής των 6.000 φρουρών του Αρταξέρξη, Αρταγέρσης σκοτώνεται από τη σφοδρή επίθεση του Κύρου. Αμέσως μετά επιτίθεται κατά του ίδιου του Αρταξέρξη χωρίς να έχει ανασυντάξει το ιππικό του. Ο Πλούταρχος αναφέρει ότι ο Αρταξέρξης επιτέθηκε με το ακόντιο του αλλά πέτυχε τον φίλο του Κύρου, Σαλτιφέρνη. Ο Κύρος κατάφερε να πληγώσει τον Αρταξέρξη, αλλά στη σφοδρή μάχη με τους βασιλικούς σωματοφύλακες σκοτώθηκε.

Το αποτέλεσμα της μάχης
Η νίκη του ελληνικού στρατεύματος όχι μόνο δεν ωφέλησε τον Κύρο, αλλά άφησε εκτεθειμένη τη δεξιά πλευρά του έτσι ώστε να έχει τη δυνατότητα να διεισδύσει το ιππικό του Αρταξέρξη. Η αδύναμη αριστερή πλευρά του Αρταξέρξη οπισθοχώρησε και προφανώς δεν υπήρξε σωστός συντονισμός από τον Κύρο ή τον Κλέαρχο για το τι πρέπει να κάνουν οι Έλληνες μετά από το εν λόγω συμβάν.

Ο αριθμός των νεκρών, ήταν πολύ μικρός για τα μεγέθη των στρατευμάτων που συγκρούσθηκαν. Ο Πλούταρχος αναφέρει δύο πιθανά νούμερα: 9.000 σύμφωνα με τον Κτησία ή 25.000 σύμφωνα με τον Δείνωνα.

Μετά την μάχη, ο Αρταξέρξης απέδωσε στον Τισσαφέρνη την υψηλότερη βασιλική εύνοια, δίνοντάς του την κόρη του για σύζυγο. Επίσης, ο Τισσαφέρνης ανέλαβε τη διοίκηση των επαρχιών του Κύρου.

Τέλος, να αναφέρουμε ότι οι πολιτιστικές διαφορές Ελλήνων και Περσών οδήγησαν στη σύγκρουση των δύο πλευρών και στην μαχητική αποχώρηση του στρατεύματος του Κλέαρχου που έγινε γνωστή ως η Κάθοδος των Μυρίων. Η ηρωική αυτή πορεία ήταν που κατέδειξε τις αδυναμίες της Περσικής Αυτοκρατορίας στους Έλληνες και πιο συγκεκριμένα στο Φίλιππο και τον Μέγα Αλέξανδρο.

2.9.16

Η Ναυμαχία στο Άκτιο, 2 Σεπ 31 π.Χ.

Η ευρωπαϊκή ιστορία βρίθει σημαντικών χρονολογιών, αλλά αν θέλαμε να μνημονεύσουμε έστω μία, που έπαιξε ρόλο καταλυτικό, αυτή σίγουρα θα ήταν το 31 π.Χ. Σ’ ένα μικρό κόλπο της Δυτικής Ελλάδας, μπροστά από τη σημερινή πόλη του Ακτίου και απέναντι από την Πρέβεζα έλαβε χώρα μία από τις σημαντικότερες ναυμαχίες του αρχαίου κόσμου. Μια ναυμαχία που ουσιαστικά σηματοδότησε το πέρασμα από τους ελληνιστικούς χρόνους σε εκείνους της ρωμαϊκής εποχής.

Η ναυμαχία στο Άκτιο και η περιφανής νίκη του Γάιου Οκτάβιου, του μετέπειτα Οκταβιανού Αύγουστου, πρόσφερε σε εκείνον τον τίτλο του αυτοκράτορα, μετατρέποντας τον σε κυρίαρχο του τότε γνωστού κόσμου και ουσιαστικά κατέστρεψε το Μάρκο Αντώνιο αλλά και κάθε φιλοδοξία της Κλεοπάτρας να κυριαρχήσει επί της Ρώμης.

Οι φιλοδοξίες και των δύο πλευρών χρονολογούνται από το 44 π.Χ. όταν το προδοτικό μαχαίρι του Βρούτου αφαίρεσε τη ζωή του Ιούλιου Καίσαρα. Η τριανδρία, που ιδρύθηκε από τους Μάρκο Αντώνιο, Γάιο Οκτάβιο και Μάρκο Αιμίλιο Λέπιδο, αρχικά κυνήγησε τους συνωμότες δολοφόνους του Ιούλιου Καίσαρα και στη συνέχεια μοίρασε στα τρία τις ρωμαϊκές επαρχίες.

Η ερωτική σχέση του Μάρκου Αντώνιου με την Κλεοπάτρα σαφώς και ανησύχησε τον Οκτάβιο ειδικά αφού ο πρώτος ήταν παντρεμένος με την Οκτάβια, την αδελφή του δεύτερου. Όταν μάλιστα ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος και η Κλεοπάτρα παντρεύτηκαν σύμφωνα με το αιγυπτιακό εθιμοτυπικό και απέκτησαν και τρία παιδιά η ανησυχία μάλλον έγινε αγωνία. Εξάλλου από παλιά η Κλεοπάτρα δεν είχε κρύψει τις φιλοδοξίες της.

Ο Οκτάβιος κατάφερε να πείσει τη ρωμαϊκή σύγκλητο ότι ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος είχε γίνει υπερβολικά επικίνδυνος για τη ρωμαϊκή δημοκρατία κι ότι σκόπευε να παραδώσει ρωμαϊκή γη στα τρυφερά χέρια της Αιγύπτιας βασίλισσας.

Με τις ευλογίες της συγκλήτου λοιπόν -που στην καθομιλουμένη θα μπορούσαμε να πούμε ότι «έβαλε τα χέρια της και έβγαλε τα μάτια της», αφού ο Οκτάβιος στη συνέχεια ανακηρύχτηκε αυτοκράτορας και της αφαίρεσε κάθε εξουσία- εκστράτευσε εναντίον του ζεύγους και ως πεδίο της αντιπαράθεσης επιλέχτηκε ο κόλπος του Ακτίου.

Η αριθμητική υπεροχή των δυνάμεων του Μάρκου Αντώνιου δεν καταγράφηκε τελικά υπέρ του και ίσως να είχε καλύτερη τύχη αν η μάχη είχε δοθεί στην ξηρά όπως ήταν η αρχική πρόθεση των αντιμαχομένων.

Ωστόσο οι πολλές λεπτομέρειες ήταν εκείνες που προκάλεσαν την πανωλεθρία των δύο εραστών και την τελική επικράτηση του Οκτάβιου.

Το όνομα Κλεοπάτρα ετυμολογικά προέρχεται από τις αρχαίες λέξεις κλέος (=δόξα) και πατήρ και αφορά επτά (7) βασίλισσες της Αιγύπτου. Η τελευταία από αυτές είναι η Κλεοπάτρα η Ζ' (Κλεοπάτρα Φιλοπάτωρ, Ιανουάριος 69 π.Χ. – 12 Αυγούστου, 30 π.Χ.). Η Κλεοπάτρα Ζ' ήταν συγκυβερνήτης της Αρχαίας Αιγύπτου με τον πατέρα της Πτολεμαίο ΙΒ' και αργότερα με τα αδέρφια και ταυτοχρόνως συζύγους της, Πτολεμαίο ΙΓ' και Πτολεμαίο ΙΔ'. Αργότερα έγινε η ανώτατη μονάρχις της Αιγύπτου, και σύναψε συμμαχία με τον Γάιο Ιούλιο Καίσαρα (Gaius Julius Caesar) που της εξασφάλισε το θρόνο. Με τον Ιούλιο Καίσαρα συνδέθηκε ερωτικά και απέκτησαν ένα παιδί, τον Καισαρίωνα. Μετά τη δολοφονία του Ιουλίου Καίσαρα, το 44 π.Χ., συστρατεύτηκε με τον Μάρκο Αντώνιο, τον οποίο ερωτεύτηκε και παντρεύτηκε με βάση το Αιγυπτιακό εθιμοτυπικό. Απέκτησαν τρία παιδιά (Κλεοπάτρα Σελήνη Β', Αλέξανδρος Ήλιος, Πτολεμαίος Φιλάδελφος). Οι ενώσεις της με τους αδερφούς της δεν είχαν ως αποτέλεσμα γεννήσεις παιδιών. Άλλωστε οι σχέσεις τους δεν ήταν ιδιαίτερα καλές.


Η βασιλεία της Κλεοπάτρας Ζ' σηματοδοτεί το τέλος της Ελληνιστικής και την αρχή της Ρωμαϊκής Περιόδου στην ανατολική Μεσόγειο. Αποτέλεσε τον τελευταίο Φαραώ της Αρχαίας Αιγύπτου, καθώς ο γιος της Καισαρίων βασίλεψε μόνο κατ' όνομα, προτού εκτελεστεί με διαταγή του Οκταβιανού μετά την τραγωδία της Ναυμαχίας του Ακτίου. Τα υπόλοιπα τρία, ορφανά μετά την αυτοκτονία της, παιδιά έλαβαν χάρη από τον Οκταβιανό, μεταφέρθηκαν στη Ρώμη και τα μεγάλωσε η Οκταβία, χήρα του Μάρκου Αντώνιου.

Προετοιμασία της μάχης
Η παράταξη των πλοίων των αντιπάλων στη Ναυμαχία του Ακτίου έχει περιγραφεί άριστα από τον Πλούταρχο, και οι αρχαιολόγοι μας έχουν εφοδιάσει με αναλυτικά σχέδια της ναυμαχίας με πλήρεις λεπτομέρειες, αλλά τα σχέδια των αρχαιολόγων δεν μοιάζουν σε όλες τις λεπτομέρειες.

Η πλευρά του Οκταβιανού
Ο Γάιος Οκτάβιος απέπλευσε από το Βρινδήσιο (Brindisiun, σημερινό Πρίντεζι) με ισχυρές ναυτικές και στρατιωτικές δυνάμεις. Κάτω από την αρχηγία του ικανότατου ναυάρχου (στρατηγού) Μάρκου Αγρίππα (Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa) κατέπλευσαν στο λιμάνι Κόμαρος (σημερινός Μύτικας) 400 πολεμικά πλοία με 75.000 πεζούς στρατιώτες, και 12.000 ιππείς. Μαρμάρινη προτομή του Αγρίππα εκτίθεται σήμερα στο Αρχαιολογικό Μουσείο Νικοπόλεως. Η προτομή βρέθηκε τυχαία από τον Ιωάννη Νούσια φύλακα του μουσείου Νικοπόλεως σε παρακείμενο χωράφι.

Υπολογίζεται ότι ο Γάιος Οκτάβιος έφτασε στην Πρέβεζα ένα μήνα νωρίτερα από τη ναυμαχία του Ακτίου και οχύρωσε το αρχηγείο του σε λόφο ύψους περίπου 100 μέτρων, βόρεια της κοινότητας Σμυρτούλας, εκεί που ανακαλύφθηκε το Μνημείο Αυγούστου. Πέραν του Αγρίππα, τον Γάϊο Οκτάβιο συνόδευαν οι στρατηγοί του Λούκιος Αρρούντιος (Lucius Arruntius), Μάρκος Λούριος (Marcus Lurius) και ο Μάρκος Οκτάβιος (Marcus Octavius). Ο στόλος του Οκτάβιου παρατάχθηκε δυτικά του Παντοκράτορα Πρέβεζας. Ειδικότερα, ο Μάρκος Οκτάβιος, ο Μάρκος Ουϊψάνιος (Marcus Uepsanius), o Λούσιος Αρρόντιος και ο Οκταβιανός παρατάχθηκαν στα ανοικτά του Ιονίου, παράλληλα προς τις αντίπαλες διατάξεις. Νότια της θαλάσσιας περιοχής του Ακτίου παρατάχθηκε με τα πλοία του ο Μάρκος Λούριος, ενώ ο Τ. Στατίλιος (Τ. Statilius), ήταν επικεφαλής του στρατοπέδου του Οκταβιανού στο λόφο της Σμυρτούλας.

Η πλευρά του Μάρκου Αντώνιου και Κλεοπάτρας
Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος με την Κλεοπάτρα έφτασαν καθυστερημένα στην περιοχή, και οχύρωσαν βιαστικά ένα στρατόπεδο στο Άκτιο, κοντά στο σημερινό αεροδρόμιο του ΝΑΤΟ, αλλά και ένα μικρότερο προχωρημένο φυλάκιο στη χερσόνησο της Πρέβεζας. Είχαν 480 πολεμικά πλοία, 60.000 πεζούς στρατιώτες και 12.000 ιππείς. Τα πλοία του Αντωνίου, αιγυπτιακής κατασκευής τα περισσότερα, ήταν μεγάλα και ισχυρά, οπλισμένα με πύργους, πετροβόλες μηχανές (καταπέλτες) και κόρακες (τεράστιες σιδερένιες αρπάγες). Αυτό όμως τα καθιστούσε και δυσκίνητα.

Ο στόλος του ενισχυόταν και από 60 Αιγυπτιακά πλοία της Κλεοπάτρας. Λέγεται ότι η Κλεοπάτρα έλαβε μέρος στη Ναυμαχία με τη Βασιλική ναυαρχίδα της, την "Αντωνία", με όλα τα κοσμήματα και θησαυρούς, κατά την Αιγυπτιακή παράδοση. Ενώ όμως ήταν ολοφάνερη η υλική υπεροχή του Αντώνιου, μεγάλο μέρος του στόλου του ήταν ουσιαστικά άχρηστο γιατί παρά τις απεγνωσμένες προσπάθειες να στρατολογηθούν πληρώματα ο αριθμός των κωπηλατών ήταν ανεπαρκής. Η θέση του Αντώνιου ήταν ήδη δύσκολη, αλλά επιδεινώθηκε γιατί μετά από αποκλεισμό του στρατηγού Αγρίππα στερήθηκε το πόσιμο νερό.

Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος είχε επικεφαλής των ναυτικών του δυνάμεων τον Μάρκο Ινστήϊο (Marcus Insteius), τον Γάϊο Σόσιο (Gaius Sosius), και τον Κλαύδιο Καίλιο (Claudius Kaelius), ενώ στην ξηρά τον Πούβλιο Κανίδιο Κράσσο (Publius Canidius Crassus). Πέραν αυτών υπήρχαν και Αιγύπτιοι στρατιωτικοί και ναυτικοί. Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος και η Κλεοπάτρα παρατάχθηκαν στον εγγύς θαλάσσιο χώρο του Στενού Πρεβέζης, από τον Παντοκράτορα μέχρι την περιοχή του σημερινού αεροδρομίου του Ακτίου, ανατολικά της παράταξης των πλοίων του Οκταβιανού. Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος παρατάχθηκε βόρεια, ο Μάρκος Ινστήϊος κεντρικά και ο Γάιος Σόσιος με τον Κλαύδιο Καΐλιο νότια. Κατά τη διάρκεια της Ναυμαχίας έγινε εκ μέρους του Αντωνίου κίνηση υπερκεράσεως με πλεύση σκαφών εντός του Αμβρακικού κόλπου προσθίως της χερσονήσου της Λασκάρας. Ο Πούβλιος Κανίδιος Κράσσος ήταν επικεφαλής του στρατοπέδου του Αντωνίου στο Άκτιο.

Διοικητική μέριμνα
Δεν υπάρχουν ιστορικά στοιχεία και είναι άγνωστο από που σιτίζονταν και υδρεύονταν αυτές οι τεράστιες στρατιωτικές δυνάμεις εκατέρωθεν (159.000 άτομα). Η πιο πιθανή εκδοχή ύδρευσης είναι οι πολλές πηγές της περιοχής αλλά και ο καθαρός τότε ποταμός Λούρος (τότε λεγόταν Χάραδρος ποταμός) που εκβάλλει στο Μιχαλίτσι, πολύ κοντά στο Αρχηγείο του Οκτάβιου. Είναι επίσης γνωστό ότι το 168 π.Χ. ο Ρωμαίος Αιμίλιος Παύλος (Aemilius Paulus) είχε επιτεθεί την Ήπειρο και τις γύρω πόλεις τις οποίες κατάστρεψε, συνέλαβε δε 150.000 ομήρους πού οδήγησε ως δούλους στη Νότια Ιταλία. Όμως πολλοί κάτοικοι των πόλεων πού κατάστρεψε ο Αιμίλιος Παύλος γλύτωσαν φεύγοντας στα βουνά και αργότερα επέστρεψαν και κατοίκησαν πάλι τις πόλεις. Το Ανακτόριον και η Βερενίκη είναι δύο από αυτές τις πόλεις πού κατοικήθηκαν πάλι και προφανώς εκατοικούντο κατά την περίοδο της Ναυμαχίας του Ακτίου. Αυτό μας δίνει εξήγηση για το θέμα της σίτισης των χιλιάδων στρατιωτών. Πέραν αυτού υπήρχαν και υπάρχουν γύρω από το Ανακτόριον και το Άκτιο πολλές μικρές λίμνες με πόσιμο νερό.

Ο «Νίκων» και ο «Ευτύχιος»
Στον Πλούταρχο («Βίοι Παράλληλοι: Η Ζωή του Μάρκου Αντώνιου») υπάρχει και το εξής χαρακτηριστικό εδάφιο: κατά τη διάρκεια της στρατοπέδευσης του Οκταβιανού στο λόφο της Σμυρτούλας Πρέβεζας, ένας γεωργός –προφανώς κάτοικος της διπλανής πόλης Βερενίκη- πέρασε κοντά στον μετέπειτα Αυτοκράτορα Οκταβιανό ο οποίος τον ρώτησε «πώς λέγεσαι;». «Νίκων» απάντησε ο γεωργός. «Και ο γάιδαρος;» «Ευτύχιος». Αυτές οι απαντήσεις θεωρήθηκαν αίσιος οιωνός για τον Γάϊο Οκταβιανό και μετά την ευτυχή κατάληξη της Ναυμαχίας με νίκη και προς τιμήν τους, διέταξε και κατασκευάσθηκαν δύο ορειχάλκινα αγάλματα του «Νίκωνα» (γεωργός) και του «Ευτύχιου» (γάιδαρος) τα οποία τοποθετήθηκαν σε βάθρα στο Μνημείο Αυγούστου. Είναι βέβαιο ότι υπήρξαν αυτά τα ορειχάλκινα αγάλματα, τα οποία όμως αργότερα μεταφέρθηκαν στην Κωνσταντινούπολη, και τοποθετήθηκαν στο στάδιο της πόλης, όπου και καταστράφηκαν κατά τη «Στάση του Νίκα».

Η ναυμαχία του Ακτίου
Η αλήθεια είναι ότι επιθυμία του Μάρκου Αντωνίου ήταν να γίνει μάχη επί ξηράς και όχι ναυμαχία. Εξάλλου όλες οι προετοιμασίες εκατέρωθεν αποσκοπούσαν σε μάχη επί ξηράς. Όμως υπήρξε διαμάχη ανάμεσα στο επιτελείο του Μάρκου Αντώνιου και τους επιτελείς Αιγύπτιους στρατηγούς της Κλεοπάτρας σχετικά με το θέμα, και τελικά αποφασίσθηκε η αναμέτρηση στη θάλασσα.

Η ναυμαχία άργησε να ξεκινήσει λόγω άπνοιας. Φαίνεται να ξεκίνησε στις 12.00 το μεσημέρι της 2ας Σεπτεμβρίου 31 π.Χ. με βορειοδυτικό άνεμο και συνεχίστηκε μέχρι αργά το απόγευμα. Η σύγκρουση έγινε στο κέντρο της παράταξης, έξω από το Στενό της Πρέβεζας, απέναντι και λίγο βόρεια του Αεροδρομίου του Ακτίου. Τα μικρά και ευέλικτα πλοία του Αγρίππα (λατινικά liburnae και Ελληνικά λιβυρνίδες) άρχισαν να εμβολίζουν το ένα μετά το άλλο τα δυσκίνητα πλοία του Μάρκου Αντώνιου. Πρόσφατες τοπικές έρευνες του Αμερικανού αρχαιολόγου εναλίων αρχαιοτήτων William Murray έδειξαν ότι σαφώς χρησιμοποιήθηκαν και ναυτικοί καταπέλτες που εκτοξεύουν λίθινες σφαίρες διαμέτρου περίπου 20-30cm. Κάποιες από αυτές έχουν φωτογραφηθεί στο βυθό, όπως και ένα πιθανό τμήμα πλοίου.
Κατά τη διάρκεια της ναυμαχίας τα εμβολιζόμενα πλοία παρεδίδοντο στην πυρά, πυρπολούμενα, ή αιχμαλωτίζονταν. Ενώ η ναυμαχία του Ακτίου εξελίσσονταν, το μεγαλύτερο τμήμα του επίγειου στρατού του Μάρκου Αντώνιου αυτομόλησε και παραδόθηκε στον Αγρίππα. Η Κλεοπάτρα, παρατηρώντας αμέτοχη τις εξελίξεις, πανικοβλήθηκε και αποχώρησε από το χώρο της ναυμαχίας, ξεφεύγοντας μέσα από ένα άνοιγμα των αντιπάλων πλοίων, αφήνοντας αβοήθητο και τραυματισμένο τον Αντώνιο. Επικράτησε πανικός και τελικά ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος διέφυγε με τα απομεινάρια του στόλου του, ακολουθώντας την Κλεοπάτρα.

Οι απώλειες της ναυμαχίας κατά τον Πλούταρχο φαίνεται να ήταν πενήντα πλοία του Αντώνιου και 5.000 άνδρες νεκροί (αρκετοί από τους οποίους πνίγηκαν). Πολλά πλοία αιχμαλωτίστηκαν από τον Αγρίππα αλλά και αρκετά παραδόθηκαν στην πυρά, αφού τους αφαιρέθηκαν τα χάλκινα έμβολα. Είναι βέβαιο ότι αφαιρέθηκαν τουλάχιστον 50 έμβολα, εκ των οποίων τα 36 τοποθετήθηκαν στο Μνημείο Αυγούστου και τα υπόλοιπα εστάλησαν στη Ρώμη. Ο Οκταβιανός είχε νικήσει και κατέστη κυρίαρχος της Ρωμαϊκής Αυτοκρατορίας.

Τελικά μετά από τέσσερα χρόνια, το 27 π.Χ., ο Οκταβιανός ανακηρύχθηκε στη Ρώμη πρώτος Princeps της Ρωμαϊκής Αυτοκρατορίας και υιοθέτησε τον τίτλο Augustus (Αύγουστος). Σε ανάμνηση της νίκης του έχτισε στο Άκτιο μεγαλύτερο και μεγαλοπρεπέστερο Ναό του Ακτίου Απόλλωνα, και καθιέρωσε να γίνονται κάθε πέντε χρόνια (από το έτος 28 π. Χ.) τα Άκτια, αγώνες με την ίδια επισημότητα που είχαν τα Ολύμπια, τα Ίσθμια, τα Πύθια και τα Νέμεα.

Ο Οκτάβιος επίσης έκτισε μια καινούργια πόλη, τη Νικόπολη (Nicopolis, Nikopolis), για να θυμίζει τη νίκη του, απέναντι από το Άκτιο, περίπου οκτώ χιλιόμετρα από την Πρέβεζα. Θαυμαστά δημόσια κτίρια της Νικόπολης είναι το Ρωμαϊκό Ωδείο (700 θέσεις), οι τρεις θέρμες (Δημόσια Λουτρά), το Θέατρο Οκταβιανού (2000 θέσεις), το Ρωμαϊκό Υδραγωγείο Νικόπολης (μήκους 50 χιλιομέτρων) με το Νυμφαίον του, το Ρωμαϊκό Στάδιο, το Γυμνάσιο, τα Ρωμαϊκά Τείχη, κλπ. Όμως το κυριότερο έργο του Αύγουστου Οκταβιανού είναι το λεγόμενο ‘’Μνημείο Αυγούστου’’ ένας ναός αφιερωμένος στους Θεούς Άρη και Ποσειδώνα, στο λόφο της Σμυρτούλας Πρέβεζας, ο οποίος κτίστηκε ακριβώς στο σημείο που είχε το αρχηγείο του.

Η Κλεοπάτρα διέφυγε με το στόλο της μέσα από ένα κενό της διάταξης των εχθρικών πλοίων, έφτασε στην Αλεξάνδρεια και ενημέρωσε ψευδώς το λαό της ότι δήθεν νίκησαν στη ναυμαχία. Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος επέστρεψε από το Άκτιο στην Αίγυπτο τραυματισμένος ελαφρά, με ένα τμήμα του στρατού του (το υπόλοιπο είχε αυτομολήσει). Μετά από ένα διάστημα μηνών ο Αύγουστος αποβιβάστηκε σε άλλη περιοχή της Αιγύπτου και όδευσε προς την Αλεξάνδρεια.

Κατά μία άποψη ο Αντώνιος βγήκε στην έρημο και «κτυπήθηκε» ανεπιτυχώς με τον Οκταβιανό. Άλλη άποψη λέει ότι ο στρατός του παραδόθηκε ή αυτομόλησε στον Οκταβιανό. Ο Μάρκος Αντώνιος τραυματίστηκε βαριά και επέστρεψε στα ανάκτορα της Κλεοπάτρας μεταφερόμενος σε άρμα. Κατά μία εκδοχή πέθανε σε λίγες ώρες από αιμορραγία ενώ κατ' άλλη εκδοχή λέγεται ότι αυτοκτόνησε με το ξίφος του μαθαίνοντας πως η Κλεοπάτρα είχε πεθάνει.

Σύμφωνα με έναν αυτόπτη μάρτυρα, τον Ολύμπιο, μεταφέρθηκε κοντά σε εκείνη και πέθανε στα χέρια της. Η Κλεοπάτρα φυγάδευσε τον 17χρονο γιό της Καισαρίωνα έγκαιρα, αλλά τελικά το παιδί συνελήφθη και εκτελέστηκε μαζί με το δάσκαλό του, με εντολή του Οκταβιανού. Λέγεται ότι δίνοντας την εντολή ο Οκταβιανός είπε «Υπερβολικά πολλοί Καίσαρες». Ο Οκταβιανός εισέβαλε στην Αλεξάνδρεια και άρχισε διαπραγματεύσεις με την Κλεοπάτρα. Κάποια στιγμή «συμφώνησαν» να οδηγηθεί η Κλεοπάτρα στη Ρώμη και να δηλώσει υποταγή στη Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία αλλά να παραμείνει στον Αιγυπτιακό θρόνο ο γιος της Καισαρίων, πράγμα πού δεν αποδέχθηκε ο Οκταβιανός. Έτσι, η Κλεοπάτρα, υπό το πρόσχημα προετοιμασίας Αιγυπτιακής κηδείας για τον Αντώνιο, στις 12 Αυγούστου 30 π.Χ., κλείσθηκε σε ένα χώρο του ανακτόρου της και κατά την παράδοση, αυτοκτόνησε με τσίμπημα κόμπρας στο στήθος. Το ίδιο έκαναν και οι δύο πιστές της υπηρέτριες. Κατά μια άλλη άποψη η αυτοκτονία έγινε με κάποιο δηλητήριο.

Οι Ρωμαίοι έσπασαν την πόρτα με πολιορκητικό κριό και βλέποντας το πτώμα της Κλεοπάτρας, ο Αύγουστος είπε «Νίκησες Κλεοπάτρα». Στα άλλα τρία παιδιά του Αντώνιου δόθηκε χάρη από τον Οκταβιανό και μεταφέρθηκαν στη Ρώμη όπου τα μεγάλωσε η Οκταβία, αδερφή του Οκταβιανού και χήρα πλέον του Αντώνιου. Το κορίτσι, η Κλεοπάτρα Σελήνη, μεγάλωσε κανονικά και παντρεύτηκε το Βασιλιά Ιούβα ΙΙ της Μαυριτανίας με τον οποίο απέκτησε δύο παιδιά. Για τα άλλα δύο παιδιά της Κλεοπάτρας και του Αντωνίου, δεν υπάρχουν πληροφορίες.

Η διαφυγή της Κλεοπάτρας
Η κλασσική άποψη των ιστορικών, με βάση τις περιγραφές του Πλούταρχου, είναι ότι η Κλεοπάτρα διέφυγε διασπώντας τον κλοιό μεταξύ Λούσιου Αρούντιου και Μάρκου Λούριου. Ξέφυγε δηλαδή μέσα από χάσμα της διάταξης των πλοίων. Κατά μία άλλη άποψη, καθαρά προφορική, μη αποδεκτή από την πλειοψηφία των αρχαιολόγων, οι Αιγύπτιοι στρατηγοί της Κλεοπάτρας είχαν σχέδιο διαφυγής το οποίο εκτελέστηκε με επιτυχία. Κατά τη δεύτερη αυτή άποψη, τα πλοία της συγκεντρώθηκαν στον όρμο Αγίου Νικολάου Αιτωλοακαρνανίας. Από εκεί μέσω ενός καναλιού (αυλακιού) διαμέτρου 5 μέτρων (υπάρχει και σήμερα, με το όνομα διώρυγα Κλεοπάτρας) πού είχαν από πριν σκάψει και καμουφλάρει κατάλληλα με δέντρα, εισήλθαν στην αβαθή ελώδη λίμνη Βουλκαριά. Από εκεί ρυμούλκησαν τα πλοία μέσα στην ελώδη περιοχή η οποία συνδέει τη λίμνη Βουλκαριά με τον Όρμο Παλαίρου Αιτωλοακαρνανίας. Από εκεί τα πλοία διέφυγαν προς την Αίγυπτο, περνώντας ανάμεσα στα νησιά Μεγανήσι και Κάλαμος γειτονικά της Λευκάδας.

Οι αρχαιολόγοι δεν υιοθετούν αυτή την άποψη διαφυγής της Κλεοπάτρας και ισχυρίζονται ότι το κανάλι της Κλεοπάτρας είναι μεταγενέστερο», και ουδεμία σχέση έχει με εκείνη την ιστορική περίοδο. Ο τίτλος «Κανάλι της Κλεοπάτρας» είναι εντελώς αυθαίρετος ιστορικά. Σύμφωνα με Γερμανό αρχαιολόγο, ο οποίος δήλωσε ότι πραγματοποίησε τομή εδάφους το έτος 2000, διαπίστωσε ότι το κανάλι είναι μεταγενέστερο, περί το 1.000 μ.Χ.

Είναι απίθανη αυτή η εκδοχή διαφυγής της Κλεοπάτρας μέσα από το μεταγενέστερο «Κανάλι Κλεοπάτρας», διότι η απόσταση μεταξύ της νότιας όχθης της λίμνης Βουλκαριάς και του Όρμου της Παλαίρου είναι περίπου 8 χιλιόμετρα και όχι πάντα ελώδους έκτασης. Τέτοιο έδαφος δεν είναι καθόλου κατάλληλο για πλεύση ή έστω για σύρσιμο βαρέων πλοίων με σχοινιά.

Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BC

The Battle of Actium! Why you see this battle on ancient Hellas? 'Cause this battle was at Actium, Greece and cause Cleopatra had Greek Origins. Cleopatra was a member of the Ptolemaic dynasty, a family of Macedonian Greek origin that ruled Egypt after Alexander the Great's death during the Hellenistic period. The Ptolemies spoke Greek throughout their dynasty, and refused to speak Egyptian, which is the reason that Greek as well as Egyptian languages were used on official court documents such as the Rosetta Stone.

The Battle of Actium in 31 B.C. was an epic showdown that pitted Mark Antony and Cleopatra against spurned former ally Octavian. When Octavian eventually reigned supreme in battle, it meant the end of the Roman Republic for good and the beginning of the Roman Empire, whose influences were ultimately felt throughout the world.

Antony's colossal defeat also led to his and Cleopatra's Shakespearean double-suicide, providing plenty of movie fodder 2,000 years later.

Roman soap opera

Rome had been a republic for more than 450 years when things started to dissolve. De facto leader Julius Caesar was assassinated on the Ides of March in 44 B.C., escalating a messy civil war and creating a power vacuum that would be filled by two equally power-hungry politicians and militarists – Mark Antony and Octavian, Caesar's adopted son.



Power sharing between the two was tenuous, but a truce was formed when Antony was betrothed to Octavian's sister. It wouldn't last long, however, because – in true soap opera form – there would soon be another woman to contend with.

Cleopatra, a beautiful and shrewd queen who already had a son by Julius Caesar, was the Pharaoh of Egypt when Rome started to implode. When Mark Antony passed through Egypt after a battle in the Near East, she seduced him too, angering Octavian over the disregard of his sister.

The resulting tension between Antony and Octavian in 31 B.C. had less to do with Octavian's hurt pride than the worry over Antony and Cleopatra's growing influence in the region, historians say, but it certainly makes for an interesting story.

Movie-style showdown

It's hard to imagine a more movie-worthy showdown than the one between Antony and Cleopatra on one side with a fleet totaling 500 warships, and Octavian on the other with almost 1,000, for control of the entire vast territory of the Roman Republic.

The Battle of Actium was fought in the waters off Greece – a Roman territory, at the time – and ended in the complete obliteration of Antony and Cleopatra's forces. When it was over, the waters were choked with the naval wreckage, historians at the time noted, as well as the bodies of 5,000 sailors.

Antony and Cleopatra did not go down with their navy. Recognizing their impeding defeat, the lovers fled in their separate ships and were chased down by Octavian. They both committed suicide instead of being captured. To seal his victory and eliminate competition, Octavian went to Egypt and executed Cleopatra's children by Antony as well as Julius Caesar's one and only son.

Shakespeare turned the story of Antony and Cleopatra into a famous play, but historically, the Battle of Actium had even more important consequences.

The alliance between Octavian, Antony and Lepidus, commonly known as the Second Triumvirate, was renewed for a five-year term in 38 BC. However, the triumvirate broke down when Octavian saw Caesarion, the professed son of Julius Caesar and Queen Cleopatra VII of Egypt, as a major threat to his power.[citation needed] This occurred when Mark Antony, the other most influential member of the triumvirate, abandoned his wife, Octavian's sister Octavia Minor. Afterwards he moved to Egypt to start a long-term romance with Cleopatra, becoming the de facto stepfather to Caesarion. Such an affair was doomed to become a political scandal.[citation needed] Antony was inevitably perceived by Octavian and the majority of the Roman Senate as the leader of a separatist movement that threatened to break the unity of the Roman Republic.


Ballistae on a Roman ship.
Octavian's prestige and, more importantly, the loyalty of his legions, had been initially boosted by Julius Caesar's legacy of 44 BC, by which 19-year-old Octavian was officially adopted as Caesar's only son and the sole legitimate heir of his enormous wealth. Antony had been the most important and most successful senior officer in Caesar's army (magister equitum) and, thanks to his military record, claimed a substantial share of the political support of Caesar's soldiers and veterans. Both Octavian and Antony had fought against their common enemies in the civil war that followed the assassination of Caesar.

After years of loyal cooperation with Octavian, Antony started to act independently, eventually raising his rival's suspicion that he was vying to become sole master of Rome. When he left Octavia Minor and moved to Alexandria to become Cleopatra's official partner, he led many Roman politicians to believe that he was trying to become the unchecked ruler of Egypt and of other eastern kingdoms, while still maintaining his command over the many Roman legions in the East.[citation needed] As a personal challenge to Octavian's prestige, Antony tried to get Caesarion accepted as a true heir of Caesar, even though the legacy did not mention him. Antony and Cleopatra formally elevated Caesarion, then 13, to power in 34 BC, giving him the vague but alarming title of "King of the Kings" (Donations of Alexandria). Being a son of Caesar, such an entitlement was felt as a threat to Roman republican traditions.[citation needed] According to a widespread belief, Antony had once offered a diadem to Caesar.[citation needed] Thereafter, Octavian started a propaganda war, denouncing Antony as an enemy of Rome, asserting that he was seeking to establish a personal monarchy over the entire Roman Empire on the behalf of Caesarion, circumventing the Roman Senate.[citation needed] It was also said that Antony intended to move the capital of the empire to Alexandria.

As the Second Triumvirate formally expired on the last day of 33 BC, Antony wrote to the Senate that he did not wish to be reappointed. He hoped that he might be regarded by them as their champion against the ambition of Octavian, whom he presumed would not be willing to abandon his position in a similar manner.[citation needed] The causes of mutual dissatisfaction between the two had been continually accumulating. Antony complained that Octavian had exceeded his powers in deposing Lepidus, in taking over the countries held by Sextus Pompeius, and in enlisting soldiers for himself without sending half to him. Octavian complained that Antony had no authority for being in Egypt; that his execution of Sextus Pompeius was illegal; that his treachery to the king of Armenia disgraced the Roman name; that he had not sent half the proceeds of the spoils to Rome according to his agreement; and that his connection with Cleopatra and the acknowledgment of Caesarion as a legitimate son of Caesar were a degradation of his office and a menace to himself.

During 32 BC, a third of the Senate and both consuls allied with Antony. The consuls had determined to conceal the extent of Antony's demands. Gnaeus Ahenobarbus seems to have wished to keep quiet, but Gaius Sosius on 1 January made an elaborate speech in favor of Antony, and would have proposed the confirmation of his act had it not been vetoed by a tribune. Octavian was not present, but at the next meeting made a reply of such a nature that the consuls both left Rome to join Antony; Antony, when he heard of it, after publicly divorcing Octavia, came at once to Ephesus with Cleopatra, where a vast fleet was gathered from all parts of the East, of which Cleopatra furnished a large proportion. After staying with his allies at Samos, Antony moved to Athens. His land forces, which had been in Armenia, came down to the coast of Asia, and embarked under L. Canidius Crassus.

Octavian was not behind in his strategic preparations. Military operations began in 31 BC, when Octavian's general Agrippa captured Methone, a Greek town allied to Antony. However, by the publication of Antony's will, which had been put into his hands by the traitor Plancus, and by carefully letting it be known in Rome what preparations were going on at Samos and how entirely Antony was acting as the agent of Cleopatra, Octavian produced such a violent outburst of feeling that he easily obtained Antony's deposition from the consulship of 31 BC, for which Antony had been designated. In addition to the deposition Octavian procured a vote for a proclamation of war against Cleopatra – well understood to mean against Antony, though he was not named. In doing this, the Senate issued a war declaration and deprived Antony of any legal authority.

The battle
Antony meant to anticipate an attack by a descent upon Italy towards the end of 32 BC, and went as far as Corcyra. But finding the sea guarded by a squadron of Octavian's ships, he retired to winter at Patrae while his fleet for the most part lay in the Ambracian Gulf, and his land forces encamped near the promontory of Actium, while the opposite side of the narrow strait into the Ambracian Gulf was protected by a tower and troops.



After Octavian's proposals for a conference with Antony had been scornfully rejected, both sides prepared for the struggle the next year. The early months passed without notable event, beyond some successes of Agrippa on the coasts of Greece, meant to divert Antony's attention. It was not until the latter part of August that troops were landed in the neighborhood of Antony's camp on the north side of the strait. Still Antony could not be tempted out. It took some months for his full strength to arrive from the various places in which his allies or his ships had wintered, and during these months not only was Agrippa continuing his descent upon Greek towns and coasts, but in various cavalry skirmishes Octavian had so far prevailed that Antony abandoned the north side of the strait and confined his soldiers to the southern camp. Cleopatra now earnestly advised that garrisons should be put into strong towns, and that the main fleet should return to Alexandria. The large contingent furnished by Egypt gave her advice as much weight as her personal influence over Antony, and it appears that this movement was agreed.

Octavian learned of this and debated how to prevent it. At first of a mind to let Antony sail and then attack him, he was prevailed upon by Agrippa to give battle. On 1 September he issued an address to his fleet, preparing them for battle. The next day was wet and the sea was rough. When the trumpet signal for the start rang out, Antony's fleet began issuing from the straits, and the ships moved into line and remained quiet. Octavian, after a short hesitation, ordered his vessels to steer to the right and pass the enemy's ships. For fear of being surrounded, Antony was forced to give the word to attack.

Order of battle
The two fleets met outside the Gulf of Actium (today Preveza), on the morning of 2 September 31 BC. Antony's fleet numbered 500,of which 230 were large war galleys with towers full of armed men.

He led these through the straits towards the open sea. Octavian had about 250 warships. Octavian's fleet was waiting beyond the straits, led by the experienced admiral Agrippa, commanding from the left wing of the fleet, Lucius Arruntius the centre and Marcus Lurius the right. Titus Statilius Taurus commanded Octavian's armies, who observed the battle from shore to the north of the straits. Antony and Gellius Publicola commanded the right wing of the Antonian fleet, while Marcus Octavius and Marcus Insteius commanded the center, with Cleopatra's squadron positioned behind them. Gaius Sosius launched the initial attack from the left wing of the fleet, while Antony's chief lieutenant Publius Canidius Crassus was in command of the triumvir's land forces.

Combat
The battle raged all afternoon without decisive result. The majority of Antony's warships were Octaries (eight bank rowing galleys), with huge rams, that could weigh over 250 tons. Antony's personal flag ship, like those of his admirals, was a Deceres (ten bank rowing galleys). The bows of the galleys were armored with bronze plates and square-cut timbers, making a successful ramming attack with similar equipment difficult.

Unfortunately for Antony, many of his ships were undermanned with rowing crews; there had been a severe malaria outbreak while they were waiting for Octavian's fleet to arrive. Making the best of the situation, he burned those ships he could no longer man, while clustering the remainder tightly together. With many oarsmen dead or unfit to serve, the powerful, head-on ramming tactic for which the Octaries had been designed was now impossible. It is estimated that Antony had around 140 ships, vs 260 ships of Octavian's fleet. Antony's ships were built heavier and wide making them ideal weapon platforms. An Octaries war galley had around 200 heavy marines, archers, and at least 6 ballista catapults. Being larger than Octavian's ships, Antony's war galleys were very difficult to board in close combat, and were able to rain down missiles onto their smaller and lower opponent's ships. Having heavily constructed hulls, Antony's war galleys were nearly impossible to sink by ramming. The only way to disable such a ship was to smash its oars, rendering it immobile and hopefully, isolated from the rest of its fleet. The main weakness of Antony's ships was their lack of maneuverability; such a ship, once isolated from support of its fleet, could be swamped with boarding attacks.

Octavian's fleet was largely made up of the standard Roman warship, Quinqueremes (five bank rowing galleys) with a few smaller Quadremes (four bank rowing galleys) mixed in. His crews were better-trained, professional, well fed and rested. Octavian's ships, although smaller, were still manageable in the heavy surf, capable of reversing their course on short notice and returning to the charge or, after pouring in a volley of darts on some huge adversary, able to retreat out of range with ease. Being lighter, they could outmaneuver Antony's ships, get in close, attack the above-deck crew with a shower of arrows and ballista-launched stones, and then retreat. A medium ballista was capable of penetrating the sides of most warships at close range and had an effective range of around 200 yards. Most ballista firing was aimed at the marines on the fighting decks of the ships.

Before the battle, one of Antony's generals, Quintus Dellius, had defected to Octavian, bringing with him Antony's battle plans. Antony had hoped to use his biggest ships to drive back Agrippa's wing on the north end of his line, but Octavian's entire fleet, aware of this strategy, stayed out of range. Shortly after midday, Antony was forced to extend his line from the protection of the shore and finally engage the enemy. Cleopatra, in the rear, could not bear the suspense, and in an agony of anxiety, gave the signal for retreat to open sea, without engaging. A breeze sprang up in the right direction, and the Egyptian ships were soon hurrying out of sight.

Antony had not observed the signal, and believing that it was mere panic and all was lost, followed the flying squadron. The contagion spread fast; everywhere sails were seen unfurling, and towers and other heavy fighting gear going by the board. Some fought on, and it was not until long after nightfall, when many a ship was blazing from the firebrands thrown upon them, that the work was done. Antony transferred to a smaller vessel with his flag and managed to escape, taking a few ships with him as an escort to help break through Octavian's lines. Those left behind were captured or sunk.

J.M. Carter argues in The Battle of Actium: The Rise and Triumph of Augustus Caesar that Antony knew he was surrounded and had nowhere to run. To try to turn this to his advantage, Antony gathered his ships around him in a quasi-horseshoe formation, staying close to the shore for safety. Then, should Octavian's ships approach Antony's, the sea would push them into the shore. Antony foresaw that he would not be able to defeat Octavian's forces, so he and Cleopatra stayed in the rear of the formation. Eventually, Antony sent the ships on the northern part of the formation to attack. He had them move out to the north, spreading out Octavian's ships which up until now were tightly arranged. He sent Gaius Sosius down to the south to spread the remaining ships out to the south. This left a hole in the middle of Octavian's formation. Antony seized the opportunity and with Cleopatra on her ship and him on a different ship, sped through the gap and escaped, abandoning his entire force.

With the end of the battle, Octavian exerted himself to save the crews of the burning vessels, and had to spend the whole night on board. On the next day, as much of the land army as had not escaped to their own lands submitted or were followed in their retreat to Macedonia and forced to surrender, and Antony's camp was occupied, bringing an end to the war.

Aftermath
The political consequences were far-reaching. Under cover of darkness some 19 legions and 12,000 cavalry fled before Antony was able to engage Octavian in a land battle. After Antony lost his fleet, his army, which had been equal to that of Octavian, deserted. Antony, though he had not laid down his imperium, was a fugitive and a rebel without that shadow of a legal position which the presence of the consuls and senators had given him in the previous year. Some of the victorious fleet went in pursuit of him; but Octavian himself visited Greece and Asia, and spent the winter at Samos; though he was obliged to go for a short time to Brundisium to settle a mutiny and arrange for assignations of land.

At Samos, Octavian received a message from Cleopatra with the present of a gold crown and throne, offering to abdicate in favor of her sons. She was allowed to believe that she would be well treated, for Octavian was anxious to secure her for his triumph. Antony, who had found himself generally deserted, after vainly attempting to secure the army stationed near Paraetonium under Pinarius and sending his eldest son Antyllus with money to Octavian and an offer to live at Athens as a private citizen, found himself in the spring attacked on two sides. C. Cornelius Gallus was advancing from Paraetonium; and Octavian landed at Pelusium, with the connivance it was believed of Cleopatra. Antony was defeated by Gallus, and returning to Egypt, advanced on Pelusium.



Despite a victory at Alexandria on 31 July 30 BC, more of Antony's men deserted, leaving him with insufficient forces to fight Octavian. A slight success over Octavian's tired soldiers encouraged him to make a general attack, in which he was decisively beaten. He tried to flee from the battle: as a result of a communication breakdown he believed that Cleopatra had been captured. Failing to escape on board a ship, he stabbed himself. He did not die at once and insisted on being taken to the mausoleum in which Cleopatra was locked up, and died in her arms. She was shortly afterwards brought to the palace and vainly attempted to move Octavian to pity.

Cleopatra committed suicide, on 12 August 30 BC. In one account, she put an end to her life by the bite of an asp conveyed to her in a basket of figs. Octavian had Caesarion killed later that month, finally securing his legacy as Caesar's only 'son'.

Octavian's victory at Actium gave him sole and uncontested control of "Mare Nostrum" (Our Sea, i.e., the Roman Mediterranean) and he became "Augustus Caesar" and the "first citizen" of Rome. This victory, consolidating his power over every Roman institution, marked the transition of Rome from Republic to Empire. Egypt's surrender following Cleopatra's death marked the final demise of both the Hellenistic Period and the Ptolemaic Kingdom.

Η ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΙΑΜΑΤΙΚΩΝ ΛΟΥΤΡΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΜΕΤΕΞΕΛΙΞΗ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΕ SPA

Τα νερά των φυσικών ή ιαματικών πηγών είναι νερά, που πηγάζουν μέσα από πετρώματα και βράχους που βγαίνουν από τα έγκατα της γης. Είναι εμπλ...